tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16909582335048832532024-02-19T03:36:34.182+00:00Education For ChoiceEducation For Choice calls for ALL young people to be given evidence-based information and education on abortion and impartial support with pregnancy decision-making.
Education For Choice calls for an end for the routine practice of giving young people misinformation about abortion in schools.
EFC is a project within Brook, the Young Peoples CharityEducation For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.comBlogger218125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-20317023848337743222015-10-23T18:21:00.001+01:002015-10-23T18:27:18.019+01:00Devolution of abortion in Scotland - Words to watch out for<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2416" style="font-size: 10pt;"><i>Thanks to the marvellous Ellie Hutchinson for this brilliant guest post!</i> </span><br />
<br />
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2416" style="font-size: 10pt;">Calling
all pro-choicers! In case you missed it, a potential shift of power
happened in the UK this week. But as it only
concerns women’s bodies, it didn’t quite get the coverage it should
have done. Blink and you’ll miss it, but Scotland may take control of a
women’s right to choose.
<a class="edited-link-editor" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-34527208" id="ms__id1110" target="_blank">Abortion law may be devolved to the Scottish Parliament</a>. This is huge. HUGE. </span><br />
<br />
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2416" style="font-size: 10pt;"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2428" style="font-size: 10pt;">The process of this and the reasons for this have been <a class="edited-link-editor" href="https://genderpoliticsatedinburgh.wordpress.com/" id="ms__id949" target="_blank">covered elsewhere,</a> so now we know what some of the <a class="edited-link-editor" href="http://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/13838747.Herald_View__The_risks_of_devolving_abortion_law/" id="ms__id2154" target="_blank">pitfalls might be,</a> and whilst we acknowledge that women’s bodies are yet
again a political football, let’s put that aside for one moment and get
cracking and get organised. We can't afford to wait for it to happen,
and sit and watch our law makers debate whether
or not they will make laws about our bodies and the bodies of people we
love/work with/know in passing/share a sense of humanity with, we have
to start lobbying now.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2416" style="font-size: 10pt;"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2428" style="font-size: 10pt;"></span></span><br />
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2425">
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2424" style="font-size: 10pt;">We know those anti-choicers are sneaky, what with their bad science, manipulation of language and their dodgy ethics (sure,
why *<b>not</b>* force someone to continue an unwanted pregnancy as
punishment. Seems legit). As such, we need to keep a close eye on what
they are saying and who they are saying it to. In other words, we need
to be ON. IT.</span></div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2901">
<span style="font-size: 10pt;"></span><br /></div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2427">
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2426" style="font-size: 10pt;">So I present to you a handy cheat sheet of words to watch out for and my own personal responses.</span><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2563" style="font-size: 10pt;"><b> </b></span><br />
<br />
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2563" style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>Pro-life -</b>
I am pro-choice, and I am also pro life. Confusing?!!! Not at all. I
really like life. I have
a good, fulfilling one, with people I love and good food to eat, and
music to dance to. I have a daughter who is the best person in the world
and I have a rewarding job meeting interesting people. I have a partner
who makes me laugh and brings me wine. Life
sure is good. I love life. You know what’s the best about life? The
ability to choose what I do with it. (see where I’m going with this?) It
is not about life, it is about choice. We need to keep reframing the
debate and repeating the pro-choice mantra “it
is not pro-life, it is anti-choice” because it is- it has nothing to do
with life, and it has everything to do with control.</span><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2579" style="font-size: 10pt;"><b> </b></span><br />
<br />
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2579" style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>Anti- child </b>-
As I’ve said, I have a daughter who is amazing and the best and oh my
days so cute and funny,
and I have lots of children in my life. I was one once! I am not
anti-child. But I am anti forcing someone to continue a pregnancy that
they don’t want. To give birth when they don’t want to. To raise a child
when they don’t want to. What is anti-child is
forcing someone (sometimes children themselves) to live a life of
punishment, of regret because of your personal interpretation of
science. No. That is not ethical. It’s also not how science works.</span></div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2581">
</div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2582">
<br />
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2583" style="font-size: 10pt;"><b id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2590">Protecting children </b>-
I’m all for protecting children, in fact I’ve
spent most of my working life working towards making the world safer
for children. Whether it’s been domestic abuse, poor housing and child
sexual abuse, I’ve been there banging my pro-child drum- children
deserve a good life. But spoiler alert- Fetuses aren’t
children. That’s why they’re called fetuses. Or embryos. But they are
not children. When an anti-choicers talks about protecting children ,
let’s talk about decent sex and relationships education and money towards support
services. Because they are the things that protect
children.</span></div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2592">
<br />
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2591" style="font-size: 10pt;"><b>Anti-family</b> -
I may have mentioned this but I have a family. I have a toddler, a
partner, parents, a sister,
a large extended family, a load of sort of in-laws, nieces who are all
lovely and lively, a community of friends and a cat. I am really into my
family. I love family! I grew up in a family with young parents, lone
parents, traditional 2.4 families- the whole
shebang, and it was amazing. We all choose different paths and
different ways to have and raise our families, but we are all bound by
love. And the buffet table. I really enjoy a family party. Family is the
heart of my life. I will always, always support my
daughter and my families right to make decisions about their lives and
their bodies, even if I don’t agree with it. I don’t judge them (out
loud anyway) and I certainly wouldn’t expect them to make the choices
I’ve made. Because that right to choose your own
path, go on your own journey, with people cheering you on- now that is
family, that is love. I am 100 % pro-family, 100% pro choice.
</span></div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2593">
</div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2863">
<br />
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2629" style="font-size: 10pt;">The
debate in Scotland is just beginning, and we have a lot of work to do.
So even though we weren’t asked, and even
though it’s come as a wee bit of a shock, let’s do this debate. If
abortion is to be devolved, what do we want to see? let’s get rid of
gatekeeping, let’s review women’s access to non-surgical procedures,
let’s talk about women’s access to services across
the country- where can people go, and how much does it cost them to get
there. Let’s get organised and let’s get focused. Abortion, as always ,
remains a “matter of conscience”* so who are our friends in
Parliament? What support do they need? </span><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2862" style="font-size: 10pt;"> </span></div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2863">
</div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2863">
<br />
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2862" style="font-size: 10pt;">There are lots of groups across Scotland working on this issue locally and nationally, so if you’d like to get involved
and support the right to choose, find them on Facebook or by emailing <a href="mailto:choice@abortionrights.org" target="_blank">Abortion Rights</a>, write to your MSP and get active.</span></div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2630">
</div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2631">
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2864" style="font-size: 10pt;">If we are to have control over our own laws, then women surely should have control over their own bodies too. </span></div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2631">
</div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2631">
</div>
<div class="yiv8277478935MsoNormal" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2631">
<br />
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2864" style="font-size: 10pt;"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2599" style="font-size: 10pt;">*like any other health care issue. Oh wait</span> </span></div>
<span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2416" style="font-size: 10pt;"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445439086287_2428" style="font-size: 10pt;"></span> </span>Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-27601658737733479692015-02-06T11:54:00.000+00:002015-02-06T11:54:26.358+00:00Bruce amendment on "sex selective" abortion - write to your MP! <div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">Fiona Bruce MP has introduced an amendment to the</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><a href="http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/seriouscrime.html" target="_blank"><b><span style="color: #3f6569; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;">Serious Crime Bill</span></b></a>, which aims to outlaw so called “sex selective abortion”. Bruce’s amendment, which has been signed by a long list of MPs including many who describe themselves as pro choice, is a worrying attempt by a seasoned anti abortion campaigner (Bruce is chair of the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmallparty/register/pro-life.htm">All Party Parliamentary Pro Life Group</a>) to undermine the right to choose.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">The amendment will be debated at the Serious Crime Bill's report stage on</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> <b>Monday 23 February.</b></span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">Anti abortion campaigners are lobbying MPs intensively, so it is vital that MPs hear the pro choice movement’s arguments about why the amendment is unnecessary – and potentially incredibly damaging. At the end of this post, you will find a draft letter which you can use to email your MP – <b>please do contact your MP</b>, as every letter is vital.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">The wording of the amendment is:<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt;">
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">"<b>Termination of pregnancy on the grounds of the sex of the unborn child</b></span></i><span style="line-height: 13.5pt;"> </span></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i style="line-height: 13.5pt;"><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">"Nothing in section 1 of the Abortion Act 1967 is to be interpreted as allowing a pregnancy to be terminated on the grounds of the sex of the unborn child.”</span></i></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">A review by the Department of Health in 2013 into</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200527/Gender_birth_ratio_in_the_UK.pdf" target="_blank"><b><span style="color: #3f6569; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;">sex ratios at birth in the UK</span></b></a></span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">found “<i>no group is statistically different from the range that we would expect to see naturally occurring</i>”.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">The amendment, if passed, will not even be effective, but could be the thin end of a wedge to undermine the 1967 Abortion Act. Laws already rightly protect pregnant women from reproductive coercion, as a form of domestic violence. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">The amendment will however introduce a duty upon doctors to consider something</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><i><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">other</span></i><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">than the health and wellbeing of the person who is pregnant: doctors will be tasked with policing the <i>intentions</i></span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">of people seeking access to abortion. As intentions are impossible to prove, this will in practice lead to racial profiling, and differing levels of availability of the full range of reproductive options, based on perceived ethnicity.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">Supporters of the amendment claim it will ‘send a message’, which it will – it will send the message that in certain circumstances, a foetus’s rights trump those of the person carrying it. Abortion laws don't need to change – what needs to change are ways of thinking that value a foetus of one sex over another.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">Numerous pieces have been published in response to the Bruce amendment pointing out its deeply flawed nature,</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/01/our-mps-must-not-sleep-walk-towards-abortion-restrictions" target="_blank"><b><span style="color: #3f6569; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;">in the <i>New Statesman</i></span></b></a>,</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><a href="http://theconversation.com/why-i-oppose-a-ban-on-sex-selection-abortion-36684" target="_blank"><b><span style="color: #3f6569; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;">on the Conversation</span></b></a>,</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/letters/11371816/Letters-Heathrow-hub-would-restore-its-monopoly-on-British-aviation-industry.html" target="_blank"><b><span style="color: #3f6569; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;">in the Letters page of the <i>Daily Telegraph</i></span></b></a>, and</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><a href="http://www.scotsman.com/news/comment-abortion-rights-must-cover-sex-selection-1-3670023" target="_blank"><b><span style="color: #3f6569; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;">in the <i>Scotsman</i></span></b></a> among others. Abortion Rights has written a letter to MPs <a href="http://www.abortionrights.org.uk/abortion-rights-letter-to-re-bruce-amendment-to-the-serious-crime-bill-on-9-2-15/">which you can read here</a>. For more background on how bans on “sex selective” abortion are an ineffective response, the Guttmacher Policy Review published</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/15/2/gpr150218.html" target="_blank"><b><span style="color: #3f6569; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;">an excellent piece in 2012</span></b></a>.</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">This very blog has two posts on the issue (from</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/sex-selective-abortion-in-news.html" target="_blank"><b><span style="color: #3f6569; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;">September 2013</span></b></a></span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">and</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/sex-selective-abortion-in-news-again.html" target="_blank"><b><span style="color: #3f6569; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;">January 2014</span></b></a>) which call into question the claims and evidence used by anti choice campaigners who are calling for a ban.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">The Bruce amendment presents a real danger to the right to safe, legal abortion in the <st1:country-region w:st="on">UK</st1:country-region>. Please act now to put forward the pro choice case, which will in the end strengthen women’s rights more than an amendment that pays lip service to feminism while undermining the right to bodily autonomy. </span><br />
<br />
<h3 style="line-height: 18.0pt; margin-bottom: 13.5pt;">
<b><span style="color: #0098d7; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.5pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">Proposed letter to your MP</span></b></h3>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<i><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">You can find your MP’s email address and contact details via this link: </span></i><br />
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><i><b><span style="color: #3f6569; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;"><a href="http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/" target="_blank">www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/</a></span></b></i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<i><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">Feel free to use the below letter as a template, or to adapt it, or to write your own – we just need to make sure we contact as many MPs as possible.</span></i><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><br />
</span> <span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">Dear [MP name],<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">I am writing to you to express my strong opposition to the amendment to the Serious Crime Bill tabled by Fiona Bruce MP, “Termination of pregnancy on the grounds of the sex of the unborn child”.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">Reproductive coercion, including forced abortion, is already illegal, as it is a severe and abhorrent form of domestic violence. Abortion clinic staff are trained to recognise the signs of someone being forced into having a termination they do not want, and follow procedures to ensure that women’s right to choose is respected. No new law criminalising women seeking abortion is required.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">A review by the Department of Health in 2013 into</span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200527/Gender_birth_ratio_in_the_UK.pdf" target="_blank"><b><span style="color: #3f6569; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;">sex ratios at birth in the UK</span></b></a></span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;"> </span><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">found “</span><i><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">no group is statistically different from the range that we would expect to see naturally occurring</span></i><span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">”. While there have been several highly upsetting first person accounts of women forced to abort due to the foetus’s sex, there is no evidence that this is a widespread practice in the UK, and no compelling argument that the Bruce amendment would have protected the women in question.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">The amendment will do nothing to address the causes of boy-preference in some communities, and will lead to racial profiling of people from communities assumed to be 'at risk' of sex selection. It will give doctors the impossible task of policing the intentions of pregnant women, and remove the Abortion Act's requirement that the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman be the overriding concern of doctors authorising terminations.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">I ask you to vote against this amendment and to make the case that your colleagues do the same.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 13.5pt; margin-bottom: 11.25pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">Yours sincerely<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<span style="color: #444444; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB;">[Name, address]</span>Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-75191651314432673822015-01-23T15:35:00.001+00:002015-01-23T15:36:29.259+00:00Crisis pregnancy centres in the spotlight again<i>We were really pleased to be asked to write an article on crisis pregnancy centres for <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/21/crisis-pregnancy-brian-souter-anti-abortion-propaganda">Comment is Free</a>. Here's our original version...</i><br />
-------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Last year, <a href="http://www.brook.org.uk/our-work/category/education-for-choice" title="http://www.brook.org.uk/our-work/category/education-for-choice">Education For Choice</a> (EFC), a project within young people’s sexual health and wellbeing charity <a href="http://www.brook.org.uk/" title="http://www.brook.org.uk/">Brook</a>, produced <a href="http://www.brook.org.uk/our-work/crisis-pregnancy-centres" title="http://www.brook.org.uk/our-work/crisis-pregnancy-centres">a report into the UK’s crisis pregnancy centres (CPCs)</a>, which are, as the introduction says, “<em>organisations independent of the NHS that offer some form of counselling or discussion around pregnancy</em>”. Sounds quite neutral, right? After all, when faced with an unplanned pregnancy, surely as a baseline everyone can agree that people of all ages deserve impartial, non-judgemental and medically accurate information about all the options open to them, including but not limited to abortion. But instead, after extensive mystery shopping trips carried out by dedicated volunteers across the country, <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/report-released-today-crisis-pregnancy.html" title="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/report-released-today-crisis-pregnancy.html">we found</a> that far too many CPCs are using their counselling room as an anti abortion space, giving people facing often complicated circumstances a dose of anti abortion propaganda and misinformation, rather than a truly impartial space to talk through their feelings and come to an informed decision.<br />
<br />
We were really glad to see the media <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-health/10621472/Abortion-scandal-Inside-Britains-unregulated-pro-life-clinics.html" title="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-health/10621472/Abortion-scandal-Inside-Britains-unregulated-pro-life-clinics.html">pick up the issue</a> of the <a href="http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/health/news/article4002879.ece" title="http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/health/news/article4002879.ece">uneven quality of counselling</a> provided by CPCs, shining a light on what goes on in these secretive places which, unless you’re either someone who’s faced an unplanned pregnancy and has Googled “I’m pregnant and I’m not sure whether I want to be” or a dedicated pro choice activist, you’re not all that likely to have heard of. Sunshine is the best disinfectant, and if a CPC advertises itself as providing non directive counselling, the public has a right to know whether this is indeed the case.<br />
<br />
Now CPCs are back in the spotlight, thanks to <a href="http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/souter-charity-funded-group-behind-bogus-abortion-course.26262982" title="http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/souter-charity-funded-group-behind-bogus-abortion-course.26262982">a sizeable donation</a> to an English CPC, <a href="http://www.choicesstortford.co.uk/index.html" title="http://www.choicesstortford.co.uk/index.html">Choices Stortford</a>, by the charitable foundation set up by evangelical Christian multimillionaire Brian Souter. Now, he has a perfect right to spend his fortune as he desires, even if it means trying to keep <a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2011/09/19/brian-souter-says-society-may-implode-if-traditional-marriage-falls/" title="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2011/09/19/brian-souter-says-society-may-implode-if-traditional-marriage-falls/">homophobic laws</a> on the books, or – as in this case – supporting CPCs. But it’s hard not to look at the donation, and think that, if he really wanted to reduce the number of abortions in the UK, Souter could have thrown his weight and his cash behind any number of different causes, from campaigning for better parental leave, to schemes to support single parents, to ensuring that all young people are given comprehensive, age appropriate <a href="http://www.brook.org.uk/about-brook/brook-position-statement-relationships-and-sex-education" title="http://www.brook.org.uk/about-brook/brook-position-statement-relationships-and-sex-education">sex and relationships education</a>, to improving access to <a href="http://www.wecantgobackwards.org.uk/" title="http://www.wecantgobackwards.org.uk/">contraception and sexual health services</a>.<br />
<br />
How will Souter’s donation be used? We can get an idea from Choices Stortford’s <a href="https://www.facebook.com/Choicescrisispregnancycentre" title="https://www.facebook.com/Choicescrisispregnancycentre">Facebook page</a>, which links to a <a href="http://www.hertsandessexobserver.co.uk/Stortford-Choices-counsellors-ready-forThe-Journey/story-21876690-detail/story.html" title="http://www.hertsandessexobserver.co.uk/Stortford-Choices-counsellors-ready-forThe-Journey/story-21876690-detail/story.html">piece in a local paper</a> proclaiming that six of its counsellors have received training on how to deliver a 10-step so called “post abortion recovery programme” called ‘The Journey’. It’s very hard to find more than the most basic details about this programme online, but we found a blog post by a CPC about it (which was taken down, coincidentally after the report’s publication), saying: “<em>Accountability: After the grieving process, a woman may become more open to the part she played in the abortion, and willing to face its consequences</em>” (see p16 of our report). This doesn’t sound like the most neutral language in the world to us, casting doubt on whether use of ‘The Journey’ is compatible with the tenets of <a href="http://www.thecounsellorsguide.co.uk/person-centered-approach-counselling.html" title="http://www.thecounsellorsguide.co.uk/person-centered-approach-counselling.html">non directive counselling</a> – which Choices Stortford <a href="http://www.choicesstortford.co.uk/information2.html" title="http://www.choicesstortford.co.uk/information2.html">says it offers</a> to people with “Post Abortion Syndrome”, a pseudo-medical condition <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/myth-busting-monday-post-abortion.html" title="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/myth-busting-monday-post-abortion.html">made up</a> by the anti abortion movement.<br />
<br />
The issues of unplanned pregnancy and pregnancy options, including abortion, are ones we in Britain, in common with – let’s face it – most of the rest of the world, have a problem talking about with honesty. It’s really important to note that there is <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/feb/12/anti-abortion-feelings-declining" title="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/feb/12/anti-abortion-feelings-declining">a strong pro choice majority</a> in the UK. But we can’t ever take our abortion rights for granted: abortion is <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/21/abortion-laws-northern-ireland-reformed-rape-foetal-abnormality" title="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/21/abortion-laws-northern-ireland-reformed-rape-foetal-abnormality">illegal in Northern Ireland</a> in most circumstances, Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/06/jeremy-hunt-12-week-abortion-limit" title="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/06/jeremy-hunt-12-week-abortion-limit">said in 2012</a> he backs cutting the time limit for abortions from 24 weeks to 12 weeks, and anti abortion <a href="http://back-off.org/">protests outside clinics</a> are becoming <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/sep/12/anti-abortion-protests-belfast-marie-stopes-clinic-security" title="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/sep/12/anti-abortion-protests-belfast-marie-stopes-clinic-security">more visible</a> and are using <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-health/10621491/Abortion-scandal-Im-sorry-but-when-did-Britain-become-pro-life-America.html" title="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-health/10621491/Abortion-scandal-Im-sorry-but-when-did-Britain-become-pro-life-America.html">tactics borrowed from the US</a>. An <a href="http://www.brook.org.uk/attachments/abortioneducationreport.pdf" title="http://www.brook.org.uk/attachments/abortioneducationreport.pdf">EFC report from 2013</a> (PDF) into how abortion is taught in schools found widespread failings, meaning that young people were often left “<em>ill-equipped to make decisions about pregnancy</em>”. Our CPC report, meanwhile, found that many of the CPCs which told our mystery shoppers manipulative misinformation about abortion also go into local schools to deliver sex and relationships education. Improving education about pregnancy options must be a priority for all schools, to fight myths about abortion, and to reduce stigma.<br />
<br />
Money talks. When it comes to CPCs, we have reason to be worried about what anti abortion pounds are saying to people in sometimes difficult circumstances.Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-49988737502655153292014-06-26T15:29:00.001+01:002014-06-26T15:29:21.024+01:00Young people and 'repeat abortion'<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Thanks to a small grant from the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health we have been able to undertake a project looking into repeat unplanned conceptions amongst young people in London. This blog gives an overview of what we found out from our workshops with young people in Croydon.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Readers of this blog will probably already know that a third of women in Britain experience abortion. What you might not know is that over a third (37%) of those accessing abortion have already had one or more terminations. <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/319460/Abortion_Statistics__England_and_Wales_2013.pdf">Recent statistics for England and Wales</a> show that in 2013 27% of abortions to women aged 25 and under were ‘repeat abortions’. In Croydon, 50% of abortions (for all ages) were ‘repeat’ procedures.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Telegraph claims the statistics show that women are having <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10895765/Lifestyle-abortions-warning-as-serial-termination-numbers-surge.html">‘lifestyle abortions’</a> and ‘using abortion as a contraceptive’. But what’s the real story? Why <i>do</i> some people have more than one abortion? Is it a problem? If so, when and why? We produced this document, <a href="http://www.brook.org.uk/images/brook/professionals/documents/page_content/EFC/EFC_FAQaboutrepeatabortion.pdf">Frequently Asked Questions about Repeat Abortion</a>, to try to answer some of these questions and to offer recommendations for professionals supporting young people to prevent unwanted pregnancies. It’s free to download so please do have a read, and pass on to your colleagues. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There are of course a number of factors which might contribute to someone experiencing one or more unplanned pregnancies – including failure rates of contraceptive methods. For example, the pill and the condom, the two most popular methods of contraception, come with actual-use failure rates of 8% and 15% respectively. In order to get young people’s input with the project we carried out workshops and focus groups in Croydon. We talked about the fact that pills and condoms are the most common forms of contraception for young people and discussed some of the problems they might have in using these methods effectively:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i><div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“Pills - sometimes you don’t remember to take them. You have to take it at a certain time...so if you don’t actually remember to take it, you’re kind of unprotected.”</i></div>
</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i><div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“As a female, you might not know how to put on a condom for instance, yeah I know it sounds really silly but let’s say you get to do the deed, you might not actually know how to put on a condom and stuff, and you kind of feel a bit stupid asking.”</i></div>
</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i><div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“A lot of my friends didn’t (carry condoms) when we were younger, because no one wanted to be called a slag...you’ve been out with your boyfriend and you pull out a condom, he’s gonna think ‘Oi, you’re ready!’ Nah, he might not be thinking that, but in your mind you could possibly think it. </i><i><div style="display: inline !important;">
<i>He’s probably thinking, ‘Ah, I’m well up for this!’ But like it would be a bit embarrassing.”</i></div>
</i></div>
</i></blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Many of the young people formed opinions about contraceptive methods based on the experiences of their friends, often expressing an objection to LARC methods, seeing them as ‘invasive’:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“My friend’s got it (the implant) yeah, and I went with her and it’s horrible. It’s like this massive thing yeah, and to get it out she has to have an operation, she cuts it open, urgh, it’s horrible. Like, you can feel it.”</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“I know it sounds silly, and you’re probably gonna laugh but it reminds me of something out of a movie, like an alien movie, you know like when they put things under your skin! The fact that you can feel it, in your day to day life, just, I don’t like that thought.”</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“I went to the clinic with my friend, she got that (IUD) and the curtain was there - she was on that side and I was on this side, and I could hear her like ‘owwwww’!”</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“And you have to be on your period to have it done don’t you, that’s what they said to my friend. And I was like, dignity?! Come on!”</i></blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The young people (who were 16+) said that their school education had lacked details on the full range of contraceptive methods:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“Whenever you had any lessons at school it was always about condoms or the pill, it was never anything else about any other contraceptions.”</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“When you’re at school, there’s not enough. All you hear about is the pill, not the implant or the injection, I never heard of that until a couple of years ago and I was like ‘what’s that?’. But then you are put off as well, by other people’s stories – of when they’ve put it in and you’re like, ‘Oh god, that doesn’t sound very nice’.”</i></blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
These young people made various suggestions for improving knowledge about reproductive health and the range of contraceptive methods available:</div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“Make it less scary... if you see a picture like that (diagram of IUD), like they need to draw it to scale maybe! You know when you look at that, even though it’s small, in your mind, you’re gonna think, oh my god it’s massive...instead of drawings (you need) an actual picture of what it actually looks like. Cos you wouldn’t know what it looked like until you actually went there would you?”</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“Maybe nurses do talks or something about how they put it in, ‘cause someone like me, could never do that ‘cause I’d just cry my eyes out. I’m really squeamish.”</i> </blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“I feel like there should be more talks within schools, about different types, like it is only condoms and the pill that are discussed.”</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“Tell teenagers about contraception through videos, so they can just watch it – when people give me leaflets on the street I just throw them away, or just put it in my bag and it will stay in there for like a year! Whereas if, I don’t know, there was like pop up ads or something .”</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“A video to show in schools, ok, these are the different types of contraception. These are the facts.”</i></blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
So young people are telling us that they would like more practical demonstrations of contraceptive methods – we’ve certainly had positive reactions when using the <a href="http://www.fpa.org.uk/product/contraceptive-display-kit">FPA’s contraceptive display kit</a>, which allows young people to see and touch different methods. There is also the suggestion that educators use more videos – and since we know young people respond to other people’s experiences, how’s about a UK version of <a href="http://bedsider.org/features/17">these Bedsider videos</a>? Someone fund us and we’ll do it!</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i><b>For more information on young people and repeat unintended conceptions have a look at <a href="http://brookdev.theminimart.com/attachments/reducing-repeat-teenage-conceptions-review-of-practice.pdf">EFC's own research from 2007</a> and <a href="https://www.bpas.org/js/filemanager/files/tpyoungpeopleinlondonabortionandrepeatabortion.pdf">Hoggart and Phillips' 2010 <u>research report</u>.</a></b></i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-32996144406324353232014-06-12T11:33:00.000+01:002014-06-12T11:33:04.440+01:00Abortion rate continues to drop in England and Wales<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 12px; text-align: justify;">
<i>The latest statistics for abortion in England and Wales (2013) have been released today and can be viewed <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/319460/Abortion_Statistics__England_and_Wales_2013.pdf">here</a> on the Gov.UK website. Here's a summary.</i></div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 12px; text-align: justify;">
For women resident in England and Wales, in 2013:</div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 12px; text-align: justify;">
</div>
<ul>
<li>The total number of abortions was 185,331 </li>
<li>The abortion rate (for ages 15-44) was 15.9 per 1000 women, 0.8% lower than last year's abortion rate, and 4.7% lower than in 2003</li>
<li>The abortion rate was highest for women aged 22</li>
<li>The under-16 and under-18 abortion rates are both lower than last year, and than in 2003</li>
<li>37% of women having an abortion had had one or more previous abortions</li>
<li>53% of women having abortions had one or more previous pregnancies that resulted in a live birth or a still birth</li>
<li>91% of abortions were carried out at under 13 weeks gestation</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>In 2013, there were 5,469 abortions for non-residents carried out in England and Wales. The 2013 total is the lowest in any year since 1969</li>
</ul>
<br />
<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 12px; text-align: justify;">
<b>So those are the numbers but what do they tell us?</b></div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 12px; text-align: justify;">
Well, first of all, the abortion rate is the lowest it's been for 16 years, the 2013 stats show a continued decrease. The same is true for the rate of abortion for under 18s - this has gone down from 18.2 per 1000 women to 11.7 per 1000 women in the last ten years. This drop reflects the reduced rate of teenage conceptions in general and is likely a result of young people's increased access to contraception. The rate of women accessing abortion early on in pregnancy is a positive sign that most are able to have their pregnancy confirmed early and access abortion when it is safest.</div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 12px; text-align: justify;">
When asked, people often assume abortion rates will be highest for teenagers, when in fact, the most common age to have an abortion was 22, and there was a slight increase in the abortion rate for women aged 25-29. <a href="http://www.bpas.org/bpasknowledge.php?year=2014&npage=0&page=81&news=645">Bpas</a> suggests that that this may well reflect the increasing desire to have children later (the average age for first time motherhood in the UK is now over 28). Over half of women accessing abortion are already mothers.</div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 12px; text-align: justify;">
In 2013, approximately 5500 abortions were performed in England and Wales for non-resident women. The majority of these women (67% and 15%) were from Ireland and Northern Ireland respectively. This shows a continuing decline in the numbers of non-resident women accessing abortion in England and Wales. The <a href="http://www.fpa.org.uk/news/fpa-reacts-abortion-statistics-2013">FPA</a> suggests that this could be due to under-reporting, or women travelling to other countries for the procedure. We also suggested <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/2012-abortion-statistics.html">last year</a> that these women may well be (illegally) finding abortion medication online, rather than travelling for the procedure, which can be very expensive.</div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 12px; text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 12px; text-align: justify;">
We join the FPA in calling for Northern Irish women's right to free, safe, legal abortion in line with women in other parts of the UK, and with bpas that, <i>"we should stop politicising abortion and accept that it is a standard part of women's healthcare."</i></div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-8566944993582349682014-05-28T15:52:00.000+01:002014-06-06T10:18:46.740+01:00Teaching about periods - Guest post from Chella Quint<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i><a href="http://www.chellaquint.com/" target="_blank">Chella Quint</a> is a performer, writer, and education researcher who uses her unique brand of comedy to engage the public in positive and enlightening conversations about menstruation. You can watch her TEDx Talk <a href="http://bit.ly/periodpositive" target="_blank">here</a>. </i><i>For <a href="http://menstrualhygieneday.org/" target="_blank">Menstrual Hygiene Day</a> we've asked her to write a guest post and share top tips from her newly launched #PeriodPositive project which is all about challenging stigma connected to menstruation.</i></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There are many sensitive topics within reproductive health and sex and relationships education. Sometimes teachers and other educators are afraid to tackle these topics in case they ‘get it wrong’, and that’s understandable: making a mistake can be scary or embarrassing, or could even feel shameful. Challenging shame is one of the goals of Menstrual Hygiene Day, and it’s an issue I tackle frequently when challenging the messages in feminine hygiene product advertising.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
There’s nothing to be ashamed of when talking about menstruation. It is a reproductive right for young people to understand their own fertility, and anyone can become a confident menstrual educator. </div>
<br />
Menstruation education should be:<br />
<br />
<ul>
<li>Free, unbranded, objective, and inclusive of re-usables like menstrual cups and cloth pads</li>
<li>Consistent, accurate, up-to-date and peer-reviewed </li>
<li>Supported more comprehensively by the National Curriculum, particularly in Science and PSHE</li>
<li>Aimed at different age groups, starting before puberty, and revisited regularly</li>
<li>Inclusive of different genders, cultures, abilities and sexualities</li>
</ul>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I've really enjoyed researching and developing this work both formally and informally, with schools, universities and through science engagement, and I'm continuing to create resources and test out lesson ideas. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I always start by asking participants to plot their menstruation comfort zone on a spectrum line and on a bulls-eye chart: </div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEglqese2jUmsB0o62-_7KWM-Je1cMfrOlzOPPhn3QSGE_l985spNXrNsuiunVY4iwTBs1BynVQEEBH8EVrkptK0PDgPv-8EoxpMM9PyH1YFriDY9o1IktTBU4zsZngdd3Nzs_iaGxsIpdrE/s1600/periodpositivebullseyechart.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEglqese2jUmsB0o62-_7KWM-Je1cMfrOlzOPPhn3QSGE_l985spNXrNsuiunVY4iwTBs1BynVQEEBH8EVrkptK0PDgPv-8EoxpMM9PyH1YFriDY9o1IktTBU4zsZngdd3Nzs_iaGxsIpdrE/s1600/periodpositivebullseyechart.jpg" height="320" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Here are some of the top tips from my research so far:<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh23D72QSaI4KIGMbZsrGlG-BJGysiRirODHbTHZBIuPA9RT0qqieHlMS_Jv-ODaVEHPubBZWeP7pDc4-4BXqfr_sPkxELLexChJhs4gin0FdqcQxzmy7S7FLAI9amBm8NiUQ7WKCKPY_6N/s1600/Top10MenstruationEducation_Page_05.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh23D72QSaI4KIGMbZsrGlG-BJGysiRirODHbTHZBIuPA9RT0qqieHlMS_Jv-ODaVEHPubBZWeP7pDc4-4BXqfr_sPkxELLexChJhs4gin0FdqcQxzmy7S7FLAI9amBm8NiUQ7WKCKPY_6N/s1600/Top10MenstruationEducation_Page_05.jpg" height="320" width="210" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRL7bkq6X1QyRqpARQRDiqF4HKJpXFBB45qnlHQwe141-Piwn5BuLJzPB84HxAKoDI8ZrCbA-NYqM3C26CnCxualZuL-I5TiCr00IDxrhNDz508BkjvRU_8AtANOy7RcTThPGFzzBfpJ9b/s1600/Top10MenstruationEducation_Page_04.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRL7bkq6X1QyRqpARQRDiqF4HKJpXFBB45qnlHQwe141-Piwn5BuLJzPB84HxAKoDI8ZrCbA-NYqM3C26CnCxualZuL-I5TiCr00IDxrhNDz508BkjvRU_8AtANOy7RcTThPGFzzBfpJ9b/s1600/Top10MenstruationEducation_Page_04.jpg" height="320" width="209" /></a></div>
<div class="" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif;">The full set of tips can be viewed <a href="http://periodpositive.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/top10menstruationeducation3.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</span><br />
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif;"> Follow <a href="https://twitter.com/PeriodPositive" target="_blank">@Periodpositive</a> for updates,
and check back at </span><span lang="EN-US"><a href="http://www.periodpositive.com/"><span style="font-family: "Helvetica","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi;">www.periodpositive.com</span></a></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif;"> for more free resources soon.</span></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9XKT_zEebCaWTqk8aDQXCCyqzOAFQ5dcSte4483NilZGyAn3ddbydRv9pVkLW2fuQ6Hf1YxMQqA9HSE_saJj6J5jwOx5EFkwrvoAncUN97rlFPIQqBlT3usYGek1WFDTmPQHJ4zc31Wd_/s1600/Top10MenstruationEducation_Page_08.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a></div>
<br />Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-37651346504946666752014-05-08T17:45:00.000+01:002014-05-08T17:45:13.152+01:00High Court ruling against free access to abortion for Northern Irish women<div style="text-align: justify;">
Today, a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-27325363" target="_blank">High Court judgement</a> ruled that women from Northern Ireland are not entitled to access abortion free of charge through the NHS in England. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Abortion is severely restricted in Northern Ireland and is only available where the pregnant woman’s life is in danger or where there is a risk of permanent and serious damage to her physical or mental health. This means that the vast majority of those seeking abortion in Northern Ireland will need to travel to access a safe, legal procedure. Currently, these women are required to pay for the procedure, which can range from approximately £400 to over £1000 for those at a later stage of pregnancy. The test case brought to the High Court by two women was rejected, meaning that the need for Northern Irish women to pay for abortion procedures carried out in England remains.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Northern Ireland is not covered by the current 1967 Abortion Act which applies in England, Scotland and Wales. The key legislation governing abortion in Northern Ireland comes from the Offences against the Person Act 1861. This means that women’s access to reproductive health care is managed according to a law which is over 150 years old and precedes the invention of the telephone and the light bulb.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The restrictive law in Northern Ireland does not prevent Northern Irish women having abortions, but it does make it more difficult. Those who can afford the private clinic fee and travel costs to England will be able to access a safe, legal abortion, but might have to significantly rearrange work and childcare to do so. Others may face delays in their attempts to raise a large sum of money in a short period of time. Overall, abortion is safe, but is safest the earlier in pregnancy it is performed, so delayed access means higher prices and also an increased chance of complications.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Those without access to such funds will be forced to continue an unwanted pregnancy (which again, is likely to have severe financial implications for someone who cannot afford an abortion), or they will resort to an illegal and potentially unsafe method of ending the pregnancy. <a href="https://www.abortionsupport.org.uk/" target="_blank">Abortion Support Network</a> is an organisation which helps women in Ireland and Northern Ireland to afford the cost of an abortion abroad. Mara Clarke, who runs the organisation, details some of the desperate measures people have taken to try to end their pregnancies:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“We have mothers calling us, telling us that their 18-year-old daughter drank a bottle of floor cleaner after she was raped at her own birthday party. We hear about women taking whole packets of birth control and washing it down with vodka.”</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Others unable to travel will buy abortion medication online through sites such as <a href="https://www.womenonweb.org/" target="_blank">Women on Web</a> – however, if they do, they risk <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/100/crossheading/attempts-to-procure-abortion" target="_blank">life imprisonment</a> for <i>‘procuring (their) own miscarriage’</i>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/307650/Abortion_statistics__England_and_Wales.pdf" target="_blank">latest statistics</a> from England and Wales show that in 2012 905 women travelled from Northern Ireland to access abortion. Many more will have travelled elsewhere or bought illegal abortion medication to end their pregnancies. Clearly, strict abortion laws do not stop abortions from happening, but can make them less safe by causing delay and restricting access. Abortion for Northern Irish women is largely a matter of economic resource. As Mara Clarke puts it, <i><a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/women-with-money-have-options-women.html" target="_blank">“women with money have options, women without money have babies”.</a></i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As a young people’s project we're particularly concerned about young women’s access to reproductive healthcare. In 2012, 43% of abortions in England and Wales for Northern Irish residents were for those under 25. Young women are less likely to have the resources necessary to travel and pay for a private abortion. A pregnant teenager seeking an abortion in Northern Ireland may suffer from stigma and lack of support, as well as financial limitations. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The young woman who presented a test case to the High Court was just 15 when she became pregnant and travelled to Manchester for an abortion. Her mother paid £600 for the procedure, some of which was covered by the Abortion Support Network, and described the process of raising the funds as ‘harrowing’. Not all young women will have the support of their families. We believe that the abortion law in Northern Ireland should be brought into line with the rest of the UK, so that all women, especially young women, are able to access the full range of reproductive healthcare they need, which includes abortion.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-58702977380226442402014-05-02T10:06:00.000+01:002014-05-02T10:06:03.023+01:00Conscientious objection obstructs women’s health … it’s not brain surgery<i>Blogpost by Lisa Hallgarten</i><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It doesn't take a brain surgeon to work out that you can’t be a brain surgeon if you don’t believe in brain surgery. Nor does it take a rocket scientist or even a person of average intelligence to work out that a doctor who is not willing to prescribe the full range of contraceptive methods should not have a qualification that implies that they are able and willing to do so. The Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) which provides a diploma in sexual and reproductive health, has recently <a href="http://www.fsrh.org/pdfs/MediaStatemenConsientiousObjection.pdf" target="_blank">updated its guidelines</a> to confirm that doctors and nurses who have a ‘conscientious objection’ to prescribing hormonal contraception - including <a href="http://www.brook.org.uk/contraception/emergency-contraception" target="_blank">emergency contraception</a> – and fitting women with IUDs and IUSs will not be able to complete the whole syllabus that is required in order to receive its diploma.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
This seems uncontroversial. No woman should go to a certified doctor with a specialist qualification to discuss contraception, only to discover that her doctor will not prescribe or fit some of the available methods for reasons of personal conscience. It would be worse still for a woman seeking emergency contraception, because those who seek the right to conscientiously object do not support any method of emergency contraception. In this situation time is of the essence: if a woman wants to take Levonelle it is most effective in the first 24 hours following unprotected sex, EllaOne must be taken within five days and an IUD fitted within the same time-frame. No woman should have to scrabble about trying to find an alternative doctor who will provide her with this last ditch chance to prevent an unwanted pregnancy. Nor should any woman be preached at about why the only moral thing to do in this situation is to cross her fingers and hope for the best. You would think that even those who support a doctor’s right to conscientiously object must agree with this, but apparently not. The <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10794194/Doctors-who-oppose-morning-after-pill-on-conscience-grounds-face-qualifications-bar.html" target="_blank">Christian Medical Fellowship (CMF) objects</a> to the updated guidance because, <i>‘it bars pro-life doctors from specialising in sexual and reproductive health and also makes it much more difficult for non specialists to get jobs in family planning or reproductive health’</i>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The CMF seems to be asking for something over and above the right to conscientiously object. It seems to be asking for the right for anti-choice doctors to be certified so that they can advertise their specialism in family planning and attract women seeking contraception, with the full intention of refusing access to the full range of family planning methods. This is not about passively opting out, this is obstruction. Likewise, <a href="http://rhmatters.wordpress.com/2013/05/14/conscientious-objection-in-scotland-a-worrying-precedent/" target="_blank">the case of the two Scottish midwives</a> who insist that they can use conscientious objection to opt out of even supervisory and management duties in relation to staff carrying out abortions. Their appeal against an original judgement which refused them this right, on the basis that it would jeopardise abortion provision in their hospital, was funded by anti-choice organisation SPUC. This kind of extension by stealth of the right to conscientiously object is addressed in a new paper, <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213560X14000034" target="_blank"><i>‘Dishonourable disobedience – Why refusal to treat in reproductive healthcare is not conscientious objection’</i></a>. The authors, Canadian abortion rights advocate, Joyce Arthur, and Austrian obstetrician Christian Fiala question the moral basis for conscientious objection and challenge its interpretation and implementation by anti-choice doctors and anti-choice institutions. It is the latest salvo in a pro-choice fightback against the once uncontested concept of conscientious objection, and crucial reading for anyone who still believes that it is a benign practice which is simply about the quiet expression of personal belief.</div>
<br />
Other useful articles on conscientious objection personal, and institutional:<br />
<br />
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(08)60547-4/fulltext" target="_blank">Conscientious commitment</a>, Bernard Dickens in The Lancet</li>
<li><a href="http://www.rhmjournal.org.uk/publications/paper-of-the-month/Termination-of-pregnancy-as-emergency-obstetric-care.pdf" target="_blank">Termination of pregnancy as emergency obstetric care: the interpretation of Catholic health policy and the consequences for pregnant women. An analysis of the death of Savita Halappanavar in Ireland and similar cases</a>, Marge Berer for RHM Journal</li>
</ul>
<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-45829813976228881922014-04-01T10:24:00.001+01:002014-04-02T10:39:38.803+01:00Intimate Partner Violence, Pregnancy and Abortion<div style="text-align: justify;">
The World Health Organisation defines <a href="http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77432/1/WHO_RHR_12.36_eng.pdf" target="_blank">Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)</a> as <i>“one of the most common forms of violence against women and includes physical, sexual, and emotional abuse and controlling behaviours by an intimate partner”</i>. IPV has been shown to increase during pregnancy. Women’s Aid states that <a href="http://www.womensaid.org.uk/domestic-violence-articles.asp?section=00010001002200010001&itemid=822" target="_blank">30% of IPV starts during pregnancy</a> and that between four and nine women out of every 100 are abused during their pregnancies and/or after having given birth. Women’s Aid identifies IPV as a prime cause of miscarriage, still-birth and of maternal deaths following childbirth.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
One form of IPV is termed <a href="http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/05/when-men-sabotage-birth-control.html" target="_blank">‘reproductive coercion’</a> – where abuse relating to contraception or pregnancy decision-making is exercised by a woman’s partner. For example, the abuser may sabotage contraception, refuse to use it, or pressurise a partner into continuing or ending a pregnancy against their wishes. Perhaps unsurprisingly, <a href="http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001581" target="_blank">a recent study</a> found an association between IPV (naming rape and sexual assault, contraceptive sabotage and pregnancy coercion as examples) and termination of pregnancy. The study found that women in violent relationships were three times more likely to conceal an abortion from their partner as women in non-violent relationships and that <i>“women undergoing terminations of pregnancy welcomed the opportunity to disclose their experiences of intimate partner violence and to be offered help”</i>. What this tells us is that pregnancy support services need to be attuned to the risk factors for IPV and to be able to provide signposting and support where required. Domestic violence support services in turn, need to be equipped to provide accurate information on pregnancy choices and <a href="http://www.brook.org.uk/get-involved/events/single/abortion-decisions-and-dilemmas-training" target="_blank">impartial support with pregnancy decision-making</a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We were concerned to see that information about IPV and pregnancy is being misrepresented by anti-abortion organisation LIFE, in its recent<a href="http://www.lifecharity.org.uk/findinghope" target="_blank"> ‘Finding Hope’ campaign</a>. In a glossy animation LIFE claims that <i>“the association between abortion and violence towards women is strong”</i>. LIFE claims that one in four women seeking abortion are <i>“victims of domestic violence”</i> and <i>“at least one in every four women seeking abortion, therefore, (is) not doing so freely but from a position of fear.”</i> LIFE makes a causal relationship between IPV and abortion which is simply not in the data, implies that abortion itself is a form of violence, and states that<i> “women who have abortions can become more self-destructive, and remain in or seek out abusive relationships as a form of self-punishment.”</i> It is highly offensive to suggest that women have abortions, or remain in violent relationships as a form of ‘self-punishment’. It is also inaccurate to extrapolate this data to claim that a quarter of women seeking abortion do so out of ‘fear’.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is not surprising that a large proportion of women who have abortions have also, at some point, experienced IPV. Both are very common within a lifetime. A third of women have an abortion. A quarter of women experience IPV. It is therefore inevitable that a significant number of those accessing abortion services will have also experienced IPV. What we know about IPV increasing during pregnancy, and about reproductive coercion as a form of IPV, means that there is of course a link between IPV, unplanned or unwanted pregnancy and therefore abortion, but this link is not one of simple causation as the LIFE Finding Hope campaign implies.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
LIFE’s suggestion that <i>“no one even asks them (pregnant women) if they are ok...let alone, why do you want an abortion...not even the health professionals tasked with caring for them”</i> is particularly misleading. The Finding Hope campaign claims to, <i>“draw attention to abortion providers' conveyor-belt service and their failure to adequately support women vulnerable to abuse”</i>, the implication being that women seeking abortion are not assessed, supported or fully consenting to the procedure. In fact, bpas, a leading abortion provider and charity, takes a ‘routine enquiry’ approach to domestic abuse, which means staff routinely ask women about safety in their relationship. All staff are trained on domestic abuse issues and bpas provides information in formats which are accessible to a range of people and signposts to relevant agencies. <a href="http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/Abortion%20guideline_web_1.pdf" target="_blank">The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</a> advises medical professionals to work to identify those at risk of IPV and provide appropriate support.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
LIFE’s campaign culminates in a fundraising appeal for its helpline service. LIFE, which campaigns against legal (and therefore safe) abortion does not appear to be promoting genuine advocacy on domestic violence issues, but rather conflates abortion with abuse in order to argue against abortion. We are particularly concerned that <a href="http://www.brook.org.uk/images/brook/professionals/documents/page_content/EFC/CPCreport/crisis_preg_centres_rept_10.2.14-2hiFINAL.pdf" target="_blank">LIFE’s ‘counselling’ services have been shown to be misleading and biased</a>, for example, one LIFE counsellor falsely claimed that abortion leads to an increased risk of breast cancer. Giving women false information in an attempt to influence their decision about a pregnancy is unethical. The narrative provided by LIFE, that women seek abortion only out of ‘fear’ or coercion, is simply not accurate, and negates women’s agency when it comes to making sometimes difficult choices about pregnancy. The connections between IPV and abortion are perhaps best looked at through the reproductive justice framework, which recognises that sometimes our 'choices' are restricted by factors such as economic status, race, class, location and so on. This useful factsheet from the National Women's Law Center,<a href="http://www.nwlc.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/intimate_partner_violence_repro_justice_10-25-13.pdfIf" target="_blank"> </a><a href="http://www.nwlc.org/resource/if-you-really-care-about-preventing-domestic-and-sexual-violence-you-should-care-about-repr" target="_blank">'If You Really Care About Preventing Domestic and Sexual Violence, You Should Care About Reproductive Justice' </a>makes clear the need to improve material conditions surrounding pregnancy and IPV and points out that restrictions on access to contraception and abortion services will only further constrain a person's ability to exercise bodily autonomy.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
*****There is a confidential 24-hour <a href="http://www.nationaldomesticviolencehelpline.org.uk/" target="_blank">National Domestic Violence Helpline</a> on 0808 2000 247. This helpline is free and run in partnership by <a href="http://refuge.org.uk/" target="_blank">Refuge</a> and <a href="http://www.womensaid.org.uk/" target="_blank">Women's Aid</a> who can provide information and support to those experiencing domestic violence. ******</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhAQ8BrAZVXmqg4ybJYjyKiUjXahewRCOA49upC8NwFgXUXcnTBNJ6XX9DjNgWsTW47zPJg5T8JpgHrOav7QeTYN_qqAl09JKIK51yB27-wD7pgRlBqG-S60isX1YYK2yV3MUnu16V70_Gn/s1600/life+slide.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhAQ8BrAZVXmqg4ybJYjyKiUjXahewRCOA49upC8NwFgXUXcnTBNJ6XX9DjNgWsTW47zPJg5T8JpgHrOav7QeTYN_qqAl09JKIK51yB27-wD7pgRlBqG-S60isX1YYK2yV3MUnu16V70_Gn/s1600/life+slide.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Slide from LIFE's 'Finding Hope' animation which places abortion within a 'cycle of abuse'.</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-74282187802078379232014-03-26T11:44:00.000+00:002014-03-26T11:44:17.524+00:00NICE guidance on young people and access to contraceptive services<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Today, NICE released evidence-based guidance entitled <a href="http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/14476/67004/67004.pdf" target="_blank">‘Contraceptive services with a focus on young people up to the age of 25’</a>, which calls for improved access to contraception for young people. </i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The guidance sets out various actions which it suggests will improve young people’s access to contraception, and thus decrease unplanned pregnancies amongst under 25s. As you may know, <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/teenage-pregnancy-rates-have-dropped.html" target="_blank">the teenage pregnancy rate in England and Wales is currently the lowest it’s been since 1969</a>, but still remains one of the highest in Western Europe.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="http://www.nice.org.uk/newsroom/news/BetterAccessToContraceptiveServicesWillReduceUnwantedPregnancies.jsp" target="_blank">The guidance</a> provides practical suggestions for improving young people’s access to sexual health services such as ensuring that services are:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
•<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span><b>Accessible</b> (have flexible opening hours and accessible materials for those with learning difficulties, or for whom English is a second language)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
•<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span><b>Comprehensive</b> (give information on the full range of contraceptive options, including the insertion of an IUD as a method of emergency contraception)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
•<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span><b>Practical</b> (youth-focused services based in schools and colleges, where young people can access them easily)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
•<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span><b>Non-judgemental</b> (staff should be trained and supported to offer impartial information)</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We were glad to see that NICE specifically mentions the importance of access to contraception following pregnancy, encouraging professionals to <i>"dispel the myth that there is no need for contraception after an abortion and explain that women are fertile immediately following an abortion."</i> We have long been concerned that <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/myth-busting-monday-abortion-makes-you.html" target="_blank">the myth that abortion causes infertility</a>, often touted by anti-abortion groups which visit schools, may have an impact on a young woman’s access to contraception following an abortion.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The media reaction to the guidance has been interesting, with some outlets focusing on NICE’s suggestion that emergency hormonal contraception (EHC) be available in advance of sexual activity (rather than just obtained following unprotected intercourse).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The guidance states that<i> "the evidence shows that advance provision of oral emergency contraception does not encourage risky sexual behaviour among young people. Evidence also shows that women who have emergency contraception in advance are more likely to use it, and to use it sooner after unprotected sex. Having emergency contraception on hand does not affect the use of other kinds of contraception."</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Certainly, we have heard anecdotally of young women’s difficulty in obtaining the morning after pill. Some pharmacists refuse to give EHC to younger women, or attempt to charge them (at around £20 this can be too much for many teenagers). Some young people living in rural areas might struggle to get hold of EHC, especially in the first 24 hours after unprotected sex, when it is most effective. It makes sense to improve access to EHC for those who need it, to ensure it can be taken when needed, as quickly as possible.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, some newspapers seem to think that there is a danger young women will ‘stockpile’ EHC. The <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/nhs/10723004/Teenage-girls-will-be-able-to-stock-up-on-morning-after-pill-under-new-NHS-guidance.html" target="_blank">Telegraph </a>opens with:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“Teenage girls will be able to stock up on the morning-after pill under new NHS guidance which will allow young women to pre-order the drugs, despite Government fears the move will increase promiscuity.”</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
An interesting concept. These young women, who are seen as too feckless to access contraception <i>before</i> having sex, are organised enough to plan to ‘stockpile’ EHC in advance of having sex. Which is it to be, lazy and incompetent or cunning and prepared?! EHC is a form of contraception, which young people already have free access to. NICE is simply stating that it might be helpful for some young women (particularly those who live in rural areas, perhaps without their own transport) to be able to access EHC in advance, in case they ever need it.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We’re glad to see such sensible, evidence-based guidance being issued, we only wish the media could resist scare-mongering around young people and contraception, and that access to sexual and reproductive health could be rid of such stigma.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-83630858590535252862014-02-27T14:35:00.001+00:002014-02-27T14:35:25.941+00:00It's time to slay the 'killer abortion' story<i>Today’s guest blogpost is from <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/-/e/B00EZ45CIC" target="_blank">Lucy V Hay</a>, a novelist, script editor and blogger who has just written a <a href="http://www.bang2write.com/my-books/the-decision" target="_blank">novel</a> exploring one young woman’s pregnancy decision making process. She shares her insight on fictional accounts of abortion.</i><br />
<br />
I’m grateful to live somewhere that allows for a woman’s right to choose, but abortion is frequently depicted in a negative light by movies and television. This <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/01/17/abortion_in_movies_and_on_tv_often_results_in_death.html" target="_blank">Slate article</a> sheds some light on the offenders, but does not, in my opinion, give a viable reason as to why this is so often the case.<br />
<br />
As well as being the author of a pro-choice novel, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/TheDecisionBookSeries" target="_blank">The Decision: Lizzie's Story</a>, I'm a script editor for movies, so hopefully I can offer an explanation – and though it may surprise some progressives, it’s <i>not</i> that the people creating those movies or television shows necessarily disagree with abortion! <br />
<br />
When learning how to create fiction, the first thing any wannabe writer is taught is that, “drama is conflict”. In other words, a writer needs to create the worst problems for his/her characters that s/he can; it is overcoming those problems that make an audience relate to that character and invest in the character’s journey. So, if a story about abortion is to have the “most” conflict it can, obviously it will include <i>death</i>.<br />
<br />
Simple, eh? But this is also where it gets complicated …<br />
<br />
… 1 in 3 women in the UK will have an abortion at some point in their lives. What’s more, the likelihood of dying from having a legal abortion is extremely low. In fact, the risk of death from childbirth is <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22270271" target="_blank">14 times higher </a>than for abortion. So for starters, a story has potentially up to a third of its female audience going, “Eh? That just wouldn't happen!” Not. Good.<br />
<br />
Secondly, though an <i>individual</i> movie or TV show may feature a death from an unsafe abortion (for example, if it was set in a time or place where abortion was illegal or inaccessible, like in the film Vera Drake), the sheer lack of variety in the representation of abortion in the media becomes problematic. It’s worth remembering, lots of people get their information from fiction … That’s why soap operas carry the famous: “If you have been affected by any of the storylines …” bit at the end of the show, alongside helpline numbers.<br />
<br />
So if writers and producers shrug their shoulders and say, “It’s just a story!”, they are right. In isolation, their “killer abortion” story <i>is</i> just a story.<br />
<br />
But all those “killer abortion” stories put together? <i>A statement</i>.<br />
<br />
Working with writers, I am always at pains to point out we must be varied in our depictions of characters and situations and the “killer abortion” is no different. We are extremely lucky that safe abortion is a reality in Great Britain and that our friends, daughters, sisters and mothers have the right to bodily autonomy. But it’s also a sad reality that very few stories reflect this: instead, whether the writers and producers believe in the pro-choice message or not, they go for the lazy and stereotypical notion that “abortion kills” or is ‘dangerous’ in other ways (such as leading to infertility). It’s time to slay the “killer abortion” story and seek out representations that empower female characters – and the audience watching them.<br />
<br />Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-84235059691632801402014-02-11T11:38:00.000+00:002014-02-11T11:57:57.182+00:00Report released today – ‘Crisis Pregnancy Centres’ in the UK<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>EFC is pleased to be able to release the <b><a href="http://www.brook.org.uk/images/brook/professionals/documents/page_content/EFC/CPCreport/crisis_preg_centres_rept_10.2.14-2hiFINAL.pdf" target="_blank">first in-depth investigation of ‘Crisis Pregnancy Centres’ (CPCs) in the UK</a>. </b></i><i>Following on from <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-health/10621472/Abortion-scandal-Inside-Britains-unregulated-pro-life-clinics.html" target="_blank">today's reports of two pregnancy counselling centres in London providing biased and inaccurate information</a> we are able to provide further information.</i></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
CPCs are organisations independent of the NHS which provide pregnancy counselling – over half also provide sex and relationships education in schools. They are often run by charities which are outwardly anti-abortion or which have ties to anti-abortion organisations. The <a href="http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/what-is-choice/abortion/abortion-crisis-pregnancy-centers.html" target="_blank">tactics of CPCs in the U.S</a> have been documented by groups like NARAL, but this is the first full-scale investigation of CPCs operating in the UK.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
EFC has identified 135 CPCs in the UK. Just under a quarter of these centres (33) were visited by volunteer mystery shoppers and background research into the remaining CPCs and their affiliations was also carried out.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Unfortunately the majority of CPCs visited were found to be giving misinformation about abortion and/or biased, unethical and unprofessional counselling methods. We are particularly concerned that many of these centres specifically market their services to young women. To give you an example, here are some quotes from the centres visited:</div>
<i><br /></i>
<i>“The only other thing that has been reported with quite strong evidence is the increase in the possibility of breast cancer following termination of pregnancy”</i> Oxford Care Centre (LIFE)<br />
<br />
<i>“There’s more risk of infertility from termination that there is from giving birth...some reports will say as low as 1% chance of infertility from termination and some will say as high as 25%”</i> Central London Women’s Centre (Good Counsel Network)<br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>“I do believe that God gives the gift of a baby”</i> Reading Lifeline (Care Confidential)<br />
<br />
<i>“The other thing with abortion is the psychological effect of post abortion trauma.. of... the grieving that you lost, ‘cause you know at the moment for some girls it seems like a very quick option, you know and it’s a half day you go in, you’re out but you are left with the emotional turmoil of what you’ve done”</i> Stillwaters Pregnancy Crisis Centre (Care Confidential)<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Regular readers of our blog will know that <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/mythbusting-abortion-and-breast-cancer.html" target="_blank">abortion does not increase the risk of breast cancer</a>, <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/myth-busting-monday-abortion-makes-you.html" target="_blank">infertility</a> or <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/myth-busting-monday-abortion-causes.html" target="_blank">mental health problems</a>. These ‘risks’ have all been discounted by medical professionals and to propose them as serious factors to consider in the decision making process inhibits someone’s ability to make an informed choice about their pregnancy. It is part of the <a href="http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/russian-health-ministry-plans-to-set-up-pregnancy-centers-to-lower-abortion?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20LifesitenewscomLatestHeadlines%20(LifeSiteNews.com%20Latest%20Headlines)" target="_blank">anti-abortion agenda</a> that seeks to limit choice under the guise of offering women support. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Centres run by Care Confidential and Life do so under the name of the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (<a href="http://www.bacp.co.uk/ethical_framework/" target="_blank">BACP</a>) which has a strict code of ethical guidelines for counsellors to follow. The directive, biased counselling offered in some CPCs cannot be considered good practice. Prominent psychotherapist Phillip Hodson states:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<i>"Counselling is the opposite of conversion. According to the ethical frameworks of our profession, no counsellor behaves properly by trying to sell to a client their personal religious or political outlook. Such an offence should trigger a formal complaint and - if this is proved - the offenders should be struck off by the regulating body. It goes without saying that supplying misleading medical information would be grounds for further sanction. It is my understanding that the regulator in such cases has always welcomed properly-founded complaints and their website explains how concerned individuals may proceed. I would hope for a swift response before it is suggested that counselling is not competent or motivated to regulate itself". </i><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
EFC has sent an official complaint to the BACP and is awaiting a response.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
More worrying still, Care Confidential is the primary service <a href="http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Abortion/Pages/Introduction.aspx" target="_blank">linked to on the front page of the NHS choices website about abortion</a>. The organisation also claims to provide <a href="http://www.clinks.org/partnership-finder/43818" target="_blank">pregnancy counselling in five women's prisons</a>. When the support Care Confidential offer is as sporadic and unreliable as our investigation has found it to be, it is far from acceptable for the NHS to offer their services to people looking for support.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Have a <a href="http://www.brook.org.uk/index.php/about-brook/education-for-choice" target="_blank">read of the report</a> and watch this space for further developments.</div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-73900830515932439012014-01-15T12:28:00.001+00:002014-01-15T12:28:59.882+00:00Sex-selective abortion in the news. Again.<div style="text-align: justify;">
Back in September, we wrote <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/sex-selective-abortion-in-news.html" target="_blank">a blog</a> in response to the Telegraph’s ‘exposé’ of sex-selective abortion in the UK. Today, the Independent has launched its own <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/the-lost-girls-illegal-abortion-widely-used-by-some-uk-ethnic-groups-to-avoid-daughters-has-reduced-female-population-by-between-1500-and-4700-9059790.html" target="_blank">campaign</a> to raise awareness of <i>"the illegal abortion of female foetuses"</i> with a series of articles headed ‘The Lost Girls’.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Firstly, as before, we take issue with the claim that sex-selective abortion is ‘illegal’. Under the 1967 Abortion Act an abortion is legal if two doctors agree, in good faith, that the continuation of the pregnancy would involve more risk to the woman’s mental or physical health than having an abortion. Therefore, if a doctor considers a woman’s individual circumstances and believes that ending the pregnancy would be better for her health and well-being he or she can permit the abortion to take place. One of the Independent's <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/the-lost-girls-if-you-have-a-girl-you-feel-youve-let-your-husband-down-9059570.html" target="_blank">articles</a> recognises some of the potential risks for a woman in this predicament:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“Karma Nirvana, based in Leeds, said it had dealt with a woman brought from Pakistan after marrying her British husband, who then underwent fertility treatment to become pregnant with a boy after she gave birth to two daughters. She had been physically and emotionally abused by her spouse and inlaws over her failure to produce a son”.</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The law permits a woman who has become pregnant as a result of rape to have an abortion if she feels it would negatively affect her to have the child, even though ‘rape’ is not a direct ground for abortion in the UK. Sex-selection falls under the same criteria – is the woman’s mental or physical health at risk if she is forced to continue with the pregnancy? (It's also worth noting that<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/23/us-abortion-idUSTRE80M2BS20120123" target="_blank"> legal abortion is statistically safer than childbirth</a>, some doctors would therefore always authorise a requested abortion on health grounds).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We haven’t seen the original data from which the Independent draws its evidence, so won’t comment on the claim that;</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>“The practice of sex-selective abortion is now so commonplace that it has affected the natural 50:50 balance of boys to girls within some immigrant groups and has led to the “disappearance” of between 1,400 and 4,700 females from the national census records of England and Wales”</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The question is, if there <i>is</i> evidence of sex-selective abortion happening in the UK (albeit on an extremely small scale) what is to be done about this?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Anti-choice groups use the ‘evidence’ (from a newspaper, <i>not</i> a medical body) in an attempt to shore up their belief that ALL abortions should be banned. <a href="https://www.spuc.org.uk/news/releases/2013/september05" target="_blank">SPUC</a> claims that sex-selective abortion "<i>demonstrates how legalising abortion for ‘hard cases’ is so easily abused"</i> and Life states:<i>“We object to all direct abortion on principle, but to end a child's life because they are the 'wrong' sex seems particularly unjust.”</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The ‘hook’ of sex-selective abortion is being used by these groups to argue that there should be <b>no</b> legal access to abortion. It feeds into anti-choice myths that women cannot be trusted to make decisions about their own bodies. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We reject the co-option of feminist rhetoric by these groups, feigning concern about women’s rights when in fact they seek to curtail them. It’s crucial that all those dedicated to protecting human rights, and improving reproductive health and gender equality pay attention to the underlying thrust of these arguments about sex-selective abortion.<a href="http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/05/31/sex-selective-abortion-bans-disingenuous-new-strategy-to-limit-womens-access-to-a/" target="_blank"> In countries where sex-selective abortion <i>is</i> a reality, the answer is not to restrict abortion access.</a> Unfortunately gender discrimination is ingrained in all societies and we have a lot of work to do to improve the status of women the world over. Refusing them ultrasounds or reproductive care is not the way to do this. Reproductive rights groups, alongside women's rights organisations, will continue to campaign for improved education and material conditions for women, to tackle male violence and discrimination in all forms.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-45798719415293505332013-12-27T14:20:00.000+00:002013-12-27T14:20:44.619+00:00Tim Montgomerie - 'moderate' on abortion? Really?<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
<i>Yes, we're still officially on holiday, but we just couldn't resist commenting on the recent 'OpEd' from Tim Montgomerie in the Times. It's behind a paywall <a href="http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/columnists/article3958225.ece" target="_blank">here</a>, but we've included quotes from some of the parts which are particularly problematic.</i></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
Montgomerie positions himself as being a 'moderate' voice on abortion, arguing that the debate only allows for 'hot and cold'. For starters, this seems to be a dishonest presentation of where he actually stands. Montgomerie is a patron of SPUC Evangelicals. SPUC (Society for the Protection of Unborn Children) is against abortion in ALL circumstances, and even believes that certain forms of contraception cause abortion. Members of <a href="https://www.spuc.org.uk/about/evangelicals/" target="_blank">SPUC Evangelicals </a>believe that <span style="color: #333233;"><i>"the widespread abuse and destruction of unborn children [therefore] constitutes a flagrant offence against almighty God."</i> So, although Montgomerie talks about lowering the time limit, or changing the law around termination on grounds of fetal abnormality it would seem his greater desire would in fact be to ban abortion completely (or he should have a re-read of the SPUC manifesto he endorses).</span></div>
<div style="color: #333233; font-family: Arial; min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
<span style="color: #333233;">So let's look at some of the arguments he puts forward for 'tighter laws'. First, Montgomerie claims that 2013 <i>"</i></span><i>was the year when the reality of foetal “gendercide” within Britain surfaced — the deliberate, discriminatory termination of unborn baby girls".</i> We've written about this <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/sex-selective-abortion-in-news.html" target="_blank">before,</a> but the 'reality' of 'gendercide' within Britain did not in fact surface. What surfaced was a 'sting' set up by the Telegraph where no abortions were actually performed. The Department of Health has reported a <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200527/Gender_birth_ratio_in_the_UK.pdf" target="_blank">normal sex ratio for births in the UK.</a></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
Then, Montgomerie drags out an old Christopher Hitchens quote (also used by Mehdi Hasan in his anti-abortion piece last year, yawn) to argue that the public is becoming more 'concerned' about abortion:</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
<i>“In order to terminate a pregnancy,” he said in 1989, “you have to still a heartbeat, switch off a developing brain, and, whatever the method, break some bones and rupture some organs.”</i></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
Well, not quite Hitcho. <a href="http://www.efc.org.uk/young_people/facts_about_abortion/statistics.html" target="_blank">As we know</a>, the majority of abortions in this country are carried out early on in pregnancy, when this simply isn't the case. We liked <a href="http://edinburgheye.wordpress.com/2012/10/14/dear-mehdi-hassan/" target="_blank">Edinburgh Eye's</a> take on this:</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
<i>Yes, that’s sometimes true. Of course, the earlier an abortion takes place, the less likely that it will be: the heart may not have developed, the brain may not yet exist, the bones and organs may still be so undeveloped that there is nothing there to break or rupture. But yes: terminating a pregnancy kills the foetus.</i> </div>
<i></i><br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i><i>But it’s also true that <a href="http://edinburgheye.wordpress.com/2012/06/18/christian-dont-like-women/"><span style="color: #1d9bdc;">anywhere girls and women are denied the right to choose abortion</span></a>, that <a href="http://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/book/companion.asp?compID=100&id=20"><span style="color: #1d9bdc;">denial of termination ensures that heartbeats are stilled</span></a>, <a href="http://www.genderacrossborders.com/2009/10/19/70000-a-year-die-from-illegal-abortions/"><span style="color: #1d9bdc;">a brain is switched off</span></a>, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3194680.stm"><span style="color: #1d9bdc;">organs are ruptured</span></a>: women die. As a woman I know wrote wistfully once, “Do you suppose if we pointed out that we have dear little faces and actual fingernails on our hands, that they’d care that we die?”</i></i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i><span style="color: #333233; font-family: Arial;"><br /></span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i><span style="color: #333233; font-family: Arial;">With regards to UK law, Montgomerie appears to support a reduction in the legal time limit for abortion:</span></i></div>
<br />
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
<i>"Others want a still earlier limit because of research that shows that even if the foetus is not viable outside the womb it can still feel pain."</i></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
In fact, the current time limit remains at 24 weeks because experts concluded that this is the limit of viability and that the best medical evidence does not support lowering this limit. The BBC reports on the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist's findings that there is no fetal pain before 24 weeks gestation <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10403496" target="_blank">here</a>.</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
Montgomerie tweeted <a href="https://twitter.com/VictoriaPeckham/status/416172369724833792" target="_blank">"I don't think abortion should ever be 'easy'"</a>. In the article he suggests introducing 'fully informed consent' by showing women scans or images of fetuses: </div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
<i>'A Michigan law based on this principle requires pregnant mothers to inspect “depictions, illustrations or photographs of foetal development”. Women are still in charge but are helped to fully understand what they’re choosing'.</i></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
Thanks Tim! Women (sorry, 'pregnant mothers' ) should be given picture books to <i>fully understand </i>what abortion is. Because, you see, they don't understand what they're choosing, but Tim does. Tim thinks <i>some</i> women should be allowed to have abortions (someone tell SPUC!) but only if it was made as difficult as possible for them, and it wasn't after 12 weeks, and the decision wasn't made due to a diagnosis of fetal abnormality.</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
He claims that the 'exception' in the UK law which allows for abortion after 24 weeks due to fetal abnormality <i>"has produced an alliance between anti-abortion and disability rights campaigners".</i> Perhaps we're reading the wrong blogs but we haven't seen evidence of this. In fact, many <a href="http://nickyclark.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/abortion-on-grounds-of-disability-is.html" target="_blank">disability rights campaigners</a> have stated their disgust with groups like SPUC co-opting disability rights campaigns to argue against a woman's right to access abortion. </div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; text-align: justify;">
Either Tim Montgomerie should be more honest about his desire to make abortion completely illegal, or we would suggest that his reconsider his allegiance to SPUC, a group which aims to do just that.</div>
<div style="color: #333233; font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; margin-bottom: 15px; min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-6719212493817973962013-12-02T08:00:00.000+00:002013-12-02T09:55:24.888+00:00Double your donation to EFC!<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>We're excited to be part of the <a href="https://secure.thebiggive.org.uk/donation/to/63648/20414/brook-young-people/education-for-choice" target="_blank">Big Give Christmas Challenge</a> this year. If you want to support our work with young people please read on for information on how donations you make <b>this week</b> can be doubled!</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
You can read more about the Christmas Challenge <a href="http://content.thebiggive.org.uk/christmas-challenge-supporters/" target="_blank">here</a> but basically, if you make a donation to EFC on the <b>5th, 6th or 7th of December</b> it has a chance of being doubled, thanks to matched funding from a generous individual donor and our 'Charity Champion' the Cabinet Office.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
These matched funds are released at 10am on Thursday, Friday and Saturday this week. In order to access these funds<b> it's important to try and make a donation as close to 10am on these mornings as possible.</b> So please set a reminder to yourself to visit the <a href="https://secure.thebiggive.org.uk/donation/to/63648/20414/brook-young-people/education-for-choice" target="_blank">Big Give donation page</a> at this time to make a donation!</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As always, your donations will go directly towards our work advocating for young people's right to evidence-based information about pregnancy options. If you have any questions about making a donation please email efc@brook.org.uk or call 0207 284 6056.</div>
<br />
Thanks for your support!Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-1702252023212038562013-11-13T12:49:00.001+00:002013-11-15T09:34:30.253+00:00Talking about abortion - share your story<div style="text-align: justify;">
This week, the New York Magazine published the <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/abortion-stories-2013-11/" target="_blank">personal accounts of 26 women who have had abortions</a>. The article points out that abortion is "part of our everyday experience" even though it might not always be discussed openly... </div>
<blockquote class="tr_bq" style="text-align: center;">
<i>"Abortion is something we tend to be more comfortable discussing as an abstraction; the feelings it provokes are too complicated to face in all their particularities. Which is perhaps why, even in doggedly liberal parts of the country, very few people talk openly about the experience, leaving the reality of abortion, and the emotions that accompany it, a silent witness in our political discourse."</i></blockquote>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Here in the UK, a third of women have an abortion. Half of young women who become pregnant will choose to have an abortion, yet the stigma around abortion can mean that the subject is not discussed. As a result, many young people will receive no education about abortion, from parents or from their school, and misinformation and stigma are able to flourish in this absence of real people's experiences and informed discussion. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We're therefore excited to announce our own small project dedicated to improving conversations about abortion! We've received a small grant from the <a href="http://abortionconversationproject.wordpress.com/2013/07/10/2013-mini-grants-awarded/" target="_blank">Abortion Conversation Project</a> in the U.S that will allow our Youth Advisors to create blog-posts sharing personal stories about pregnancy decision making and abortion. And here's where you come in. We'd like people of all ages and genders to send us their stories relating to reproductive choice. Our Youth Advisors have created a <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/5WJ5G3D" target="_blank">short survey</a> form which allows people to share their story anonymously, or not, depending on what they feel comfortable with. These stories (which might be just simple statements, or longer narratives) will be made into visual, engaging blog-posts to be shared with other young people via the <a href="http://edforchoice.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">Youth For Choice tumblr</a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Please help us talk about abortion, in an honest and open way. <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/5WJ5G3D" target="_blank">Share your story here</a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>For more on the impact of misinformation and stigma on young women seeking abortion see <a href="http://www.bpas.org/js/filemanager/files/tpyoungpeopleinlondonabortionandrepeatabortion.pdf" target="_blank">this report</a> on young people and repeat abortion in London.</i></div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-15949302653031634992013-09-05T16:44:00.001+01:002013-09-05T16:44:36.376+01:00Sex-selective abortion in the news<div style="text-align: justify;">
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt is upset that the two doctors involved in the Telegraph’s 2012 sex-selective abortion ‘sting’ have not been prosecuted, and is seeking<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/gender-abortions-health-secretary-jeremy-hunt-seeks-urgent-clarification-over-lack-of-prosecutions-8799082.html" target="_blank"> ‘urgent clarification’</a> on the case. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has stated that it is not in the public interest to prosecute the doctors and has referred the case on to the General Medical Council (GMC). As far as we know the doctors have already had conditions put on their registration to prevent them from work involving abortion.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Over in the Telegraph’s ‘Wonder Women’ section, journalist Cathy Newman claims that <i>“wherever you stand on abortion,<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/10288660/The-selective-abortion-of-girls-is-a-crime.-Simple-as.-So-why-no-criminal-charges.html" target="_blank"> it's extremely hard to understand why the Crown Prosecution Service has decided not to press criminal charges against doctors who agreed to arrange terminations because of the sex of the unborn baby.”</a></i> Both Newman and Hunt forcefully assert that "<i>sex-selection abortion is banned in the UK under the terms of the 1967 Abortion Act"</i> and is<i> "against the law"</i>. Newman goes on to claim that <i>“there's growing evidence (sex selective abortion is) also carried out illegally in communities in this country.” </i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>So, what is the law around sex selective abortion? And is it happening in the UK? Why haven’t these doctors been thrown in jail?</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
First of all, it’s important to note that these cases were not of women <i>actually</i> requesting sex-selective abortions. This was an artificial situation set up by the Telegraph, where undercover journalists underwent consultations and filmed the results, something the CPS seem to have taken into account:<i> “in these cases no abortions took place or would have taken place.”</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Secondly, the law around abortion and sex-selection is a lot more complicated than these articles imply. As <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/myth-busting-monday-abortion-for-sex.html" target="_blank">our blog from last year</a> points out, the 1967 Abortion Act does not specifically prohibit abortion for this reason. However, abortion is a criminal act unless certain grounds are met. The majority of abortions in the UK are performed under Ground C: ‘the continuation of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.’ This ground could cover a number of individual circumstances and it is left to doctors to decide which of these satisfy the legal criteria for abortion. As legal abortion is statistically safer than childbirth, some doctors may consider this ground legitimate for women who do not provide further ‘reasons’ for their abortion, other than a desire to end the pregnancy. There is more information about the law in<a href="http://www.abortionreview.org/index.php/site/article/1143/" target="_blank"> this article</a> by Professor of Law Sally Sheldon.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Thirdly, it is not clear what ‘evidence’ there is of sex-selective abortion happening in the UK. Certainly two journalists requesting abortions they don’t intend to have is not evidence that women in the UK are actually having abortions due to sex selection. The Government’s investigation into the issue showed that the UK’s "gender ratio" is "<i><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200527/Gender_birth_ratio_in_the_UK.pdf" target="_blank">well within the normal boundaries for populations</a>".</i></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In an older article for the Wonder Women section of the Telegraph <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/9796112/Abortion-laws-dont-need-to-change-attitudes-towards-girls-do.html" target="_blank">Emma Barnett</a> explores this very difficult issue and concludes that,<i> "abortion laws don't need to change: attitudes towards girls do... it’s so important that abortion remains legal, above board and crucially transparent...Pushing abortion into the backstreets would help no one."</i> We need to remain aware of the nuance in this debate and avoid sliding into anti-choice rhetoric which in reality does not support women to make the decision to have an abortion in <i>any</i> circumstance.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
For more information, read the <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/gender-abortion-new-revelation.html" target="_blank">EFC blog</a> on this issue from last year, when the allegations first arose.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-12724018669150265872013-09-05T10:47:00.000+01:002013-09-09T13:01:56.050+01:00'Women with money have options, women without money have babies'<i>This is a guest blog from Mara Clarke, founder and director of the Abortion Support Network.</i><br />
<br />
What would you do if the condom broke? If your pill hadn't worked? If you had been raped? If you were faced with an unplanned, unwanted pregnancy? What would you do?<br />
<br />
If you lived in England, Scotland or Wales, you could go to your GP or your local sexual health clinic, and get a referral for an abortion. You could do this regardless of your race, class, financial situation, or age. You could make this decision on your own, or with the support of your parents, or friends.<br />
<br />
But what if you lived in a country where abortion was illegal? And you couldn't tell your parents? And your boyfriend threatened to paint “murderer” on your house, if you had a boyfriend? And you had no money? And no credit card, passport or photo ID?<br />
<br />
Abortion is virtually against the law in Ireland and Northern Ireland. This is the case whether you are pregnant as a result of rape, whether the foetus has catastrophic abnormalities, if the woman involved is 14, or if, like most women having abortions, it simply isn't the right time to have a baby. But of course as we all know, making abortion against the law doesn't stop abortion from happening. It just means that, when faced with an unplanned, unwanted pregnancy, women with money have options and women without money have babies – or do dangerous and desperate things.<br />
<br />
This is even more true for young women living in Ireland and Northern Ireland who need abortions. Because of the stigma, many of these young women aren't able to tell friends or family members. And yet somehow they need to raise the £400 to £2000 it can cost to travel and pay privately for an abortion.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.abortionsupport.org.uk/" target="_blank">Abortion Support Network</a> is a charity that provides financial assistance, accommodation and confidential, practical information to women from Ireland and Northern Ireland forced to travel to access a safe, legal abortion. Since launching in October of 2009, we have heard from almost 1,000 women. More than 250 of those calls have been from women and girls under the age of 25. At least 30 of those were aged 16 or under.<br />
<br />
Here’s an example of what these young women have told us:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>“I can’t have this baby, I've been trying to get money together and I told the father and he left me. I'm in college and have no money. I depended on my parents and they will disown me if they knew I was pregnant. I'm getting really worried and I don’t know what to do. Anything will help. I know my time is nearly up so I'm beginning to really worry, I know I shouldn't have left it this long but this is my last option and I can’t have this baby.”</i></blockquote>
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>“If my parents find out I've had sex, they’ll kill me. I'm not kidding.”</i></blockquote>
A young teenager whose mother called us in desperation. The pregnancy was a result of rape and her daughter was severely self-harming.<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>“I'm 19 and a student and I'm approximately 18 weeks pregnant. I can’t financially and emotionally support a child so I'm planning on having an abortion. The problem is my partner and I have both been saving and scraping money together but we’re still short. I was enquiring as to whether we could get any assistance, be it monetary or just providing us with somewhere to stay when we get there.”</i></blockquote>
A young teenager with medical complications that could have been compromised by continuing her pregnancy. She and her boyfriend both sold their electronics in order to raise £100.<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>“I'm a college student and I'm pregnant. I can’t tell a soul and I'm devastated. My parents work so hard to put me through college that I can’t drop out to have a child. Never mind afford to support a child, nor necessarily want one at this stage in my life. Is there any assistance I could have or even an ear?”</i></blockquote>
A young teenager with an abusive ex-boyfriend. He was threatening her, to try and make her continue with the pregnancy. Her family were not in a position to provide support, emotionally or financially, a family friend put herself in debt to help with the costs but was still unable to provide the full cost.<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<i>“I'm growing more desperate by the week. I'm 6 weeks pregnant with an unwanted baby that I cannot have for financial and personal reasons. My boyfriend is unwilling to help with the costs of the abortion, as are my parents and his family. I have to cover this entire cost by myself and I am an unemployed student who will probably be homeless before long. Please let me know if there is anything you can do to help.”</i></blockquote>
These young women came from all parts of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Some had support and others didn't. Many had to delay their abortions as they tried to raise the necessary funds, causing even more expense as the price of abortion rises with gestation.<br />
<br />
But what did these women have in common?<br />
<br />
They were pregnant.<br />
They didn't want to be pregnant.<br />
They were poor.<br />
And not a single one of them thought they would ever be in a position where they would have to call a total stranger in another country to ask for money for an abortion.<br />
<br />
<i>Mara Clarke is the founder of Abortion Support Network, an almost entirely volunteer run charity that helps women travelling from Ireland and Northern Ireland to access a safe and legal abortion. To find out how you can help or to sign up for their monthly eNewsletter visit <a href="http://www.abortionsupport.org.uk/">www.abortionsupport.org.uk</a> or follow <a href="https://twitter.com/AbortionSupport" target="_blank">@AbortionSupport</a> on Twitter.</i><br />
<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-23028698918995101342013-08-23T11:38:00.000+01:002013-08-23T11:38:02.516+01:00Feminism, Catholicism and Abortion<i>This post is a response to the interview with Caroline Farrow, a ‘pro-life feminist’ on the <a href="http://faithinfeminism.com/feminist-and-pro-life/" target="_blank">Faith in Feminism </a>blog.</i><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We are always interested to hear from people of faith on the ways in which their religion or spirituality plays into their thoughts on abortion and reproductive rights in general. In the pro-choice movement, people are often too quick to assume that all Christians, or all Muslims would automatically be against abortion. In fact, religious teachings vary, with many allowing for abortion in certain circumstances (and nearly always with regards to protecting the pregnant person’s health).</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The Catholic Church however <i>does</i> prohibit abortion in all circumstances. Abortion, along with contraception and masturbation is forbidden by the church. However, this doesn't mean that Catholics do not masturbate, access abortion or use contraception to control their reproduction.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A <a href="http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/topics/catholicsandchoice/documents/Factstellthestoryweb.pdf" target="_blank">2011 report by Catholics For Choice </a>showed that 98% of Catholic women in the U.S have used a form of contraception banned by the Vatican. Catholic women have abortions at the same rate as non-Catholics, and 86% of those surveyed disagreed with the church’s teaching on abortion.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
These figures show us that individuals use their own personal conscience to make decisions which affect their lives, and their families. Farrow makes a convincing case for <a href="http://www.fpa.org.uk/contraception-help/natural-family-planning" target="_blank">‘Natural Family Planning’</a> (NFP) (which is indeed extremely effective if practised properly) and this may well be a favourable option for those who wish to avoid pregnancy without using condoms or hormonal methods of birth control. However, clearly, for many Catholic women other forms of contraception have proven to be a better fit for their lifestyles. A pro-choice point of view would acknowledge the importance of allowing these women to make the choice which is right for them. If they wish to follow the church’s teachings and practice NFP, great, let’s make sure they have the support and information they need to do so. If they want to try other methods, or use condoms to help protect against STIs, then this should also be accessible for them.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Unfortunately a pro-life perspective tends to mean that this choice (which many make already, regardless of what their religion teaches) is disregarded and taken away. A ‘pro-life’ point of view holds that <a href="http://www.spuc.org.uk/news/releases/2012/november14" target="_blank">doctors were right to deny Savita an abortion</a> because <i>“it is not ethical to induce delivery of an unborn child if there is no prospect of the child surviving outside the womb”</i>. An individual might decide that <i>they</i> would never have an abortion in any circumstance, but as soon as this decision is projected and extended to others it limits human rights. It limits women’s rights.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Farrow herself is extremely supportive of the 40 Days for Life ‘vigils’, which aim to <a href="http://carolinefarrow.com/2012/10/02/thats-the-way-to-do-it/" target="_blank">shut down abortion clinics</a> and therefore restrict women's access to abortion. Standing outside abortion clinics praying for women who have made a decision, which may or may not have been difficult for them, smacks of a desire to project one’s own position onto others, believing them unfit to decide for themselves. </div>
<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-62332604552394998152013-08-07T18:05:00.000+01:002013-08-07T18:05:57.557+01:00"How to get rid of a pregnancy"<br />
<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px;">
</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Having seen people tweeting about the weird and wonderful ways readers reach their blogs, we decided to delve into our own statistics to see what people have been typing into Google to end up at this blog. </div>
<div style="min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Although of course plenty reached the EFC blog through links on other sites, or searches like 'abortion education in schools', one of the most common searches was the phrase 'how to get rid of a pregnancy'. Other popular searches included variations on 'pills to get rid of pregnancy'. Further investigation showed that quite a few people reached the EFC blog through a link on Ask.com which lead to <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/theres-pill-you-can-take-to-get-rid-of.html" target="_blank">this</a> Mythbusting Monday post about medical abortion, explaining why the phrase 'abortion pill' can be misleading (Early Medical Abortion is actually a process involving two lots of medication, and two to three visits to a clinic, rather than just 'taking a pill').</div>
<div style="min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It was sobering to realise that many people visiting this blog are not just looking for general information related to work or study but are likely themselves facing an unwanted pregnancy and unable to access the medical support they need to have an abortion. Sobering, but not all that surprising when you know that a decent proportion of visitors to this blog are from the USA and Ireland.</div>
<div style="min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
As you may know, although abortion is legal in the United States, access is severely restricted in some areas, meaning that those seeking abortion (especially poorer women) may look for 'cheaper' methods of ending a pregnancy, such as buying medication online. <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/01/22/interactive-map-america-s-abortion-clinics.html" target="_blank">This graphic</a> shows the varying levels of abortion access in the U.S - with mandatory waiting periods or insurance restrictions being enforced in many States, access to safe, legal abortion can be difficult.</div>
<div style="min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Ireland, in turn, has one of the world's most restrictive abortion laws. Abortion is only available to save a pregnant person's life. Last year, <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/211790/2012_Abortion_Statistics.pdf" target="_blank">almost 4000 women travelled from Ireland to England and Wales to have an abortion</a>. Again, these women will have needed the financial means to pay for the procedure itself as well as transport and associated costs. Although the <a href="https://www.abortionsupport.org.uk/" target="_blank">Abortion Support Network</a> has been set up to help these women pay for the procedure, it can't support everyone. A <a href="http://www.vice.com/read/abortion-pills-on-the-rise-in-ireland" target="_blank">recent article in Vice</a> argued that more and more Irish women are turning to the internet to purchase abortion medication to administer themselves. The article points out that women taking this route are not recorded in the official statistics, although with <a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/medicines-board-warns-on-abortion-pills-after-250-seized-1.1485634" target="_blank">hundreds of packages of such medication being seized every year,</a> the number is clearly significant. </div>
<div style="min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Of course, ordering and using this medication is illegal in Ireland. But it seems that some are desperate enough to try to end a pregnancy even via methods which could put them in prison. And this is not just true of women in Ireland, or the U.S, but anywhere where abortion is illegal or restricted. And as the <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3816412.html" target="_blank">Guttmacher Institute</a> makes clear, this method can be safer than traditional 'backstreet abortions' performed in unsanitary conditions: <i>"In settings where abortion is illegal or highly restricted, it (abortion medication) has provided many women for the first time with a safe and discreet means for early termination of unwanted pregnancy." </i><a href="http://www.womenonwaves.org/en/page/2583/safe-abortion-hotlines" target="_blank">Safe Abortion Hotlines </a>in places such as Chile, Poland and Kenya show that where abortion is illegal or very severely restricted, there will still be women who find ways to end their pregnancies.</div>
<div style="min-height: 14px; text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Unfortunately we were not surprised to see that some of these women had found their way to our site through searches for information on unwanted pregnancies which they cannot end in registered medical establishments, either due to legal, practical or economic constraints.</div>
<br />
<br />
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-43305245651465159452013-07-17T16:10:00.000+01:002013-07-17T16:10:31.663+01:00The ‘Parliamentary Inquiry’ on Abortion and Disability<div style="text-align: justify;">
Today, anti-choice MP Fiona Bruce launched a report entitled <a href="http://www.abortionanddisability.org/resources/Abortion-and-Disability-Report-17-7-13.pdf" target="_blank">‘Parliamentary Inquiry into Abortion on the Grounds of Disability’</a>. This is an unofficial inquiry, not sanctioned by Parliament, but rather the outcome of a special interest group of anti-choice MPs getting together to discuss abortion on the grounds of fetal abnormality. Although evidence was accepted from a range of individuals and organisations (including Brook and fpa) that which is presented in the report, and the final recommendations, are heavily weighted towards those who would like to see the legal right to terminate a pregnancy due to serious fetal abnormality removed completely.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />A quick glance at the list of written submissions tells you a great deal about the inherent bias in this inquiry. The majority are from ‘pro-life’ organisations which believe that abortion should be illegal in <i>every </i>circumstance - SPUC, Life, ProLife Alliance, No Less Human (which is actually SPUC, but hey, have two submissions guys!), Image and Pregnancy Helpline, Christian Medical Fellowship, and the list goes on. Throughout the report, submissions from individuals with no professional background, and from anti-abortion lobby groups are given greater emphasis than medical experts and respected bodies such as the British Medical Association, the Royal College of Nurses and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The report uses this biased presentation of evidence to argue that <i>“allowing abortion up to birth on the grounds of disability is discriminatory”</i> and recommends that Parliament considers reducing the time limit for abortion on the grounds of disability or repealing this ground completely. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />There is a suggestion that the current law, which allows for abortion after 24 weeks where there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would have serious physical or mental abnormalities, is <i>"contrary to the Equality Act 2010"</i>. This is nonsense. The law does not consider a fetus to be a legal person until birth, so the Equality Act does not apply. The further ‘evidence’ is mostly a mixture of:</div>
<br />• <b>Dodgy statistics </b>- <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/04/us-ireland-abortion-idUSBRE8930P420121004" target="_blank">anti-abortion campaigner Patricia Casey</a> is quoted as saying that <i>"at the time of abortion 40% of women will be experiencing mental health symptoms"</i> and links abortion for fetal abnormality to depression and post traumatic stress disorder with no reference given for this claim.<br />
<br />• <b> Emotive, inappropriate language</b> – phrases like <i>“not allowing doctors to deliberately kill any baby after viability”</i> pepper the report and are a sign that the focus is not on professional medical analysis of the complex facets of abortion law and practice.<br />
<br />• <b>Anti-abortion bias</b> – this is not surprising in a report formed by groups and individuals opposed to abortion in every circumstance. Life’s written evidence that abortion for fetal abnormality <i>"overlooks the fact that the unborn child is as much the doctor’s patient as is the mother"</i> is included alongside personal testimonies from parents who claim they were pressurised into having an abortion, and received little support from medical professionals with their decision to continue the pregnancy. The fact that <a href="http://www.sconews.co.uk/youth/7714/a-youthful-enthusiasm-for-pro-life/" target="_blank">one of these parents, Lynn Murray, has been a member of SPUC for over 18 years</a>, is not declared. Many of the members of the Commission have a history of anti-abortion campaigning – one example is Lord McColl, a patron of the Centre for Bioethics and Public Policy which runs <a href="http://www.abort67.co.uk/content/cbr-worldwide" target="_blank">Abort67</a> in the UK, who you might know as the group which holds up gory posters of supposed aborted fetuses outside abortion clinics. Hmm.<br />
<br />So we’ve established that this is essentially the position of a minority group of anti-choice MPs and campaigning bodies, which does very little to present the views of the experts who work in this field with the necessary authority that they deserve. However, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10183668/MPs-Abortions-being-carried-out-for-cleft-palates.html" target="_blank">it’s already being reported </a>as if it were a neutral cross-party inquiry with the backing of the BMA. It’s important that:<br />
<br />• This is not regarded as an official parliamentary inquiry, which accurately reflects the views of a range of bodies involved in reproductive care, disability campaigning and fetal medicine.<br />
<br />• It is not used as evidence that the right to abortion on the grounds of fetal abnormality is ‘discriminatory’ or causes discriminatory attitudes towards people with disabilities. There are some excellent blogs on this subject which you might want to have a look at for more discussion of this (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/oct/30/how-prolifers-hijacked-paralympics" target="_blank">Frances Ryan in The Guardian</a>, and <a href="http://nickyclark.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/abortion-on-grounds-of-disability-is.html" target="_blank">Nicky Clark’s blog</a> are good places to start).<br />
<br />• The real people making decisions about often much wanted pregnancies are not forgotten in this. Abortions performed after 24 weeks are extremely rare (they made up <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/211790/2012_Abortion_Statistics.pdf" target="_blank">less than 0.1% of all abortions</a> last year) and are a result of considered choices regarding health, quality of life, existing children and many other factors. One parent in the report says: <i>“Please understand that finding out that your unborn baby has a serious disability is one of the hardest things that a parent can hear. Please don’t make it any harder by taking away our right to choose”.</i><br />
<br />• Those who do choose abortion, and the doctors who support them are not demonised. Underlying this report is an implication that doctors are pressurising women into choosing abortion where there is a diagnosis of abnormality. We believe it is important to trust women making these tough decisions, and to trust doctors to give the information and support they require to make an informed choice. The wonderful <a href="http://www.arc-uk.org/" target="_blank">Antenatal Results and Choices</a> exists to provide further support to those individuals and couples faced with making such decisions.<br />
<br /><i>For further information on this inquiry and the backgrounds of those involved, have a look at <a href="http://www.ministryoftruth.me.uk/2013/03/06/the-anti-abortion-lobbys-sham-parliamentary-inquiry/" target="_blank">this blog</a> from the Ministry of Truth.</i><br /><br />Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-72626398830586816252013-07-11T12:22:00.000+01:002013-07-11T12:22:15.309+01:002012 Abortion Statistics<i>The latest statistics on abortions carried out in England and Wales were released today. The main findings are summarised below but you can view full information (including data tables) <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-of-health/series/abortion-statistics-for-england-and-wales" target="_blank">here</a>. This year, the Department of Health also carried out a consultation on changes to the publication of abortion statistics, the results of which can be found <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/211795/Abortion_Statistics_Consultation_Full_response__2013_Final.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</i><br /><br />• The 2012 abortion rate for all ages is 16.5 per 1,000 women – the lowest rate since 1997 and 6% lower than in 2011. The abortion rate was highest for women aged 21 (31 per 1000 women). <br /><br />• The under 16 and under 18 abortion rates were slightly lower than in 2011 (3 per 1000 and 12.8 per 1000 respectively).<br /><br />• The number of abortions taking place under 13 weeks gestation remains at 91%, and 97% of abortions were funded by the NHS. The percentage of medical abortions also remains consistent, at 48% (47% in 2011).<br />
<br />• In 2012, 52% of women undergoing abortions had one or more previous pregnancies that resulted in a live or stillbirth.<br />
<br />A significant difference from 2011’s data is the number of non-resident women accessing abortion in England and Wales:<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQ6CmppRyFL9j-19HtgM4D7qKh3zvDe7LA6m01a0Cgdu0CZWEWRF1LqTrFzyM74wGppNdTSHWAlQroKiaKb-bXRQAEjl2Sn0XxjtU5ebcjEiLzGG1ZqRWrXCiWOsAb7f_v3-CxdPKSEy-q/s1600/Clipboard01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a><br />• In 2012, there were 5,850 abortions for non-residents versus 6151 in 2011. The 2012 total is the lowest in any year since 1969.<br /><br />The majority of non-residents accessing abortion in England and Wales are from the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland (making up 83.6% of the total number of non-residents in 2012). It’s unclear as to why this figure is lower than it has ever been but it’s possible that more women in Ireland are accessing medical abortion online; rising awareness of services like <a href="https://www.womenonweb.org/" target="_blank">Women on Web</a> through <a href="http://www.vice.com/en_dk/read/abortion-pills-on-the-rise-in-ireland" target="_blank">public campaigns</a> may mean that more Irish women are using illegal methods to end their pregnancies rather than face the cost and difficulty of travelling abroad to do so.<br /><br />Another interesting statistic which deserves to be unpicked is the over-representation of certain ethnic groups in the abortion statistics, particularly with regards to those women who have more than one abortion.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi56_BqpDpmrlZ_6cp_u8bSaZE0AAoa_oGo6y7VKRxPzu1YBnEd04hL_kEUrTT-iDyOzb0yPZ4l6e5e9AJx0covldGHjxOfYQ6EXQubHWIt2D00lmYYvGsHqa6r8TBgPXuZHAUeAnn1b8R7/s1600/Clipboard02.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="199" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi56_BqpDpmrlZ_6cp_u8bSaZE0AAoa_oGo6y7VKRxPzu1YBnEd04hL_kEUrTT-iDyOzb0yPZ4l6e5e9AJx0covldGHjxOfYQ6EXQubHWIt2D00lmYYvGsHqa6r8TBgPXuZHAUeAnn1b8R7/s320/Clipboard02.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />As you can see from the table, women who are of Black or Mixed ethnicity are more likely to have had one or more previous abortions than women of other ethnic backgrounds. The statistics do not tell us why this is, but we might question if the information provided to particular communities on contraception and abortion is relevant and accessible. We know that there are links between ethnicity and deprivation, and between deprivation and unintended pregnancy so this too might be a factor. More research is clearly needed into the intersections between ethnicity, unintended pregnancy and abortion, but in the meantime, it is crucial to note that women from <i>all</i> backgrounds can and do experience unintended pregnancy and abortion and we should not shy away from providing culturally appropriate, evidence-based information in every setting.<br /><br />As a result of the consultation on the publication of abortion statistics a few changes have been made, the most significant of which being local level statistics being presented by CCG (clinical commissioning groups) rather than PCT (primary care trust) data due to the changes to the health system.<br /><br />One interesting aspect of the consultation was to see the number of anti-abortion groups which had responded, a number of whom requested information on fetal sex to be represented in the abortion data. This is presumably a response to recent scaremongering suggesting that 'sex selective abortions’ were taking place in the UK (despite the <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200527/Gender_birth_ratio_in_the_UK.pdf" target="_blank">Department of Health’s own 2013 report</a> finding that the UK’s ‘gender ratio’ is "well within the normal boundaries for populations").<br />
<br />The response to the consultation gives a firm response to this request:<br />
<blockquote>
"Information about the sex of the foetus and NHS number are not currently collected on the HSA4 form. To collect such information would require changes to the legislation, in particular the Abortion Regulations 1991, as well as to clinical practice. This is not in the scope of this consultation. The majority of abortions take place before 10 weeks gestation and it is not currently possible to identify a foetus’s gender at that stage. Identifying the gender of aborted foetuses over 10 weeks’ gestation raises ethical and clinical issues. The Government has no plans to introduce such a practice." </blockquote>
<br />
Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-26611966153439472222013-07-05T14:16:00.000+01:002014-08-13T15:00:23.092+01:00What the SPUC?<div style="text-align: justify;">
We regularly get requests from teachers across the country who are looking for a ‘pro-choice’ speaker to come in and balance out a talk on abortion from a ‘pro-life’ group. We’ve written before about EFC’s general <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/why-does-efc-recommend-against-inviting.html" target="_blank">concerns with this approach</a>. Namely that a ‘debate’ around abortion can be confusing and stigmatising for young people, and rarely provides them with the factual information they need for living their lives (especially when we know that a third of women have an abortion). This blog gives specific examples of the issues involved when inviting the most well-known anti-abortion group, SPUC, to a school. The teachers I speak to are rarely aware that SPUC runs an outspoken campaign against same-sex marriage and that the information they use regarding contraception and abortion is very often at odds with the medical establishment. So here is the lowdown:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<b>• Misinformation about abortion</b><br />
SPUC’s educational materials make claims about abortion which are not supported by medical experts. For example, they link termination of pregnancy to <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/myth-busting-monday-post-abortion.html" target="_blank">‘post-abortion trauma’</a>, which is an invented medical condition, and claim in their <a href="http://www.spuc.org.uk/youth/student_info_on_abortion/abortion_schoolpack" target="_blank">student pack</a> that <i>'the risk of ectopic pregnancy may increase up to 30% after a first abortion and 160% after two or more</i>'. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (who tend to know about such things) state that there is <a href="http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/Abortion%20guideline_web_1.pdf" target="_blank">no evidence for a link between abortion and subsequent ectopic pregnancy</a>. A SPUC speaker also made misleading links between <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/23/abortion-what-children-schools" target="_blank">abortion and breast cancer</a> at a Cambridgeshire school last year.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<b>• Misinformation about contraception</b><br />
SPUC’s booklet <a href="http://www.spuc.org.uk/education/contraceptives" target="_blank">‘Birth control methods which can cause abortion’</a> suggests that all forms of hormonal contraception can act as abortifacients. This is based on the belief that pregnancy begins at fertilisation, rather than implantation, which is <a href="http://www.fpa.org.uk/contraception-help/emergency-contraception#does-it-cause-an-abortion" target="_blank">unsupported by the law and established medical practice</a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<b>• Stigmatisation of abortion and use of distressing images</b><br />
The SPUC speaker in Cambridge told students that <i>'rape is the ultimate unplanned pregnancy...for some people who’ve been raped and had the baby, even if they don’t keep it, something positive comes out of that whole rape experience'.</i> SPUC's student pack claims that<i> 'pregnancy as a result of rape is extremely rare...the extreme physical and psychological trauma of being raped makes it difficult for fertilisation or implantation to occur.'</i> <a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/todd-akins-not-only-one-claiming-that.html" target="_blank">This is untrue</a> and may be upsetting for those who have experienced rape. SPUC has a history of presenting information to young people in a way which can be distressing. As far as we know, SPUC continues to use graphic images in its school workshops, and images of aborted fetuses remain on the ‘education’ section of the website, likely to be used by young people for school projects.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><br />• Stigmatisation of same-sex relationships and family units</b><br />
SPUC currently runs a campaign against the legalisation of same-sex marriage, which it claims would increase numbers of abortions. John Smeaton, the director of SPUC, states the following on his blog:<br />
<i>“The fundamental argument against gay marriage is that homosexuality is disordered, as it is radically at variance with the truth and meaning of human sexuality ... Catholics must proclaim loud and clear that it is impossible for any homosexual relationship to be a marriage because genuine personal, sexual and spiritual union between persons of the same-sex is impossible.”</i> SPUC has also made statements against same-sex couples adopting, claiming that <a href="http://www.spuc.org.uk/news/releases/2010/april1" target="_blank">‘lesbian parentage is not in the best interests of children’</a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
<b>• Opposition to sex education </b><br />
SPUC fronts the ‘Safe at School’ campaign which lobbies against so called ‘explicit’ sex education in schools. A <a href="http://spuc-director.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/please-support-national-petition.html" target="_blank">recent blog</a> claims that sex education lessons tackling pornography are <i>‘about dangling porn in front of young school pupils and encouraging them to embrace it in their lives.’</i> The group has expressed concern about sex education materials which <i>‘include explicit <a href="https://www.spuc.org.uk/documents/papers/2013/spucactivitiesreview2012" target="_blank">images of male and female sex organs, lessons on menstruation</a> in mixed classes (boys and girls)’ </i>and has labelled masturbation<i><a href="http://educationforchoice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/masturbation-is-self-abuse-and.html" target="_blank">‘intrinsically unethical’</a>.</i><br />
<br />
SPUC are extremely well funded and do not charge for their schools work. They regularly contact schools with the offer of a free speaker on this tricky subject and it’s understandable that many teachers decide to run this lesson using an external organisation. However, we would advise all teachers to think carefully about how such an organisation might fit with their school’s SRE and equality and diversity policies, as well as their commitment to the well-being of their students, some of whom may already have experience of abortion, and many of whom will definitely go on to.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
If SPUC has visited your school, we’d be interested in hearing what you thought about the lesson.<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXP3lqVQKgPm9duzGYX9dfwjfB9saHfqIyQk47l7WWyf6tnOHSQvvT16oGdLvEQhYbeKW_JveHBfqsO7QlXgrGUO0yaeJq39eYudPjKnfPGEveX_kowdZZQsR48GFje08iMB7RBEkgajaK/s1600/spucleafletfront.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXP3lqVQKgPm9duzGYX9dfwjfB9saHfqIyQk47l7WWyf6tnOHSQvvT16oGdLvEQhYbeKW_JveHBfqsO7QlXgrGUO0yaeJq39eYudPjKnfPGEveX_kowdZZQsR48GFje08iMB7RBEkgajaK/s320/spucleafletfront.jpg" height="320" width="238" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">SPUC leaflet opposing same-sex marriage</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
</div>
<br />Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-23337588807570657032013-07-03T12:28:00.000+01:002013-07-03T12:28:51.802+01:00Being an EFC Youth Advisor<i>Holly, one of EFC's new Youth Advisors, reports back on the training she attended and what she hopes to get out of her time volunteering with us...</i><br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3fVc0h4WVlpAV7duxfm7o1CXUEaXTdD0xFr-JaBXkNom3Z_z3ABQ-YNtXgMQx0JEctn83ckLmpVpK3eFmaBUEknUqOvaCg4NLIgx1TLqF2e7bJOjgzf_KD5KuYJuuJVdlQCiT6_PfAQ0c/s1600/EFC+training+25th+June+2013+003.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi3fVc0h4WVlpAV7duxfm7o1CXUEaXTdD0xFr-JaBXkNom3Z_z3ABQ-YNtXgMQx0JEctn83ckLmpVpK3eFmaBUEknUqOvaCg4NLIgx1TLqF2e7bJOjgzf_KD5KuYJuuJVdlQCiT6_PfAQ0c/s320/EFC+training+25th+June+2013+003.JPG" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">EFC Youth Advisors at the recent training day</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
A great evening of sweets, chocolate, fruit and lively conversation. For many this was the first time everyone had met the group of people they were going to be spending quality time with once a month. <br /><br />It was great hearing such a range of opinions and seeing lively debate spark off in regards to some topics that many people find controversial. Knowing that everyone could speak openly about their opinions without fear of being told they were wrong and the general supportive atmosphere meant there was ample opportunity to get your voice heard.<br /><br />New facts I learned from the training: Canada has no time limit on abortion. In America the nearest clinic can be up to 50 miles away which means it is not easily accessible for many women with unplanned pregnancies. The criteria for a doctor to carry out an abortion in the UK can seem incredibly severe but there is liberal room for interpretation. I feel incredibly lucky to live in a country where the clinics and doctors are easily accessible, though I’m aware that there’s a lot of work to be done about misinformation and the myths that surround abortion.<br /><br />I look forward to the next meeting for more interesting conversation and to get to know what makes everyone else tick in the group when it comes to abortion.<br />Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1690958233504883253.post-66594152758661804162013-06-11T10:00:00.000+01:002013-06-11T10:25:34.442+01:00Become a pro-choice pal and support EFC<div style="text-align: justify;">
We all know someone who has had an abortion. A third of women in the UK will access the procedure at some point in their lives, yet it remains a subject too ‘controversial’ or ‘sensitive’ to be spoken about in many homes, schools and communities. Unfortunately this stigma and silence provides fertile ground for myths and misinformation to grow. The internet is awash with false information and distressing images of abortion, and anti-abortion organisations run <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/aug/02/abortion-pregnancy-counselling-found-wanting" target="_blank">‘crisis pregnancy centres’</a> which mislead and frighten women in an attempt to persuade them not to end their pregnancies.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Many people are shocked to discover that <a href="http://www.brook.org.uk/images/brook/professionals/documents/page_content/EFC/abortioneducationreport.pdf" target="_blank">these same groups are also invited to speak in schools across the country</a>. Unfortunately the anti-choice movement in the UK continues to use misinformation to promote its point of view. Young people are being told that abortion may increase their risk of getting cancer or of becoming infertile. They are told that contraception <i>‘is wrong and threatens health’</i>. These groups have substantial funds to deliver such work - <a href="https://www.duedil.com/company/06195816/spuc-pro-life-limited/financials" target="_blank">SPUC</a> has an annual turnover of over £1.7 million and <a href="http://www.lifecharity.org.uk/lottery-funded" target="_blank">Life recently received £300,000 of Big Lottery Funding</a>.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br />
We’re here to speak out against this misinformation and stigmatisation of a choice that half of pregnant teenagers will make. We advocate for young people’s right to evidence-based, impartial information on their pregnancy options, and provide training and resources to enable professionals to help young people making tough decisions about pregnancy. We know we have support from a wide range of parents, teachers and health professionals. But <a href="http://www.justgiving.com/educationforchoice/Donate" target="_blank">we need donations</a> to ensure that this work can be carried out; so that EFC can continue to be the small project which, according to our charity patron Polly Toynbee, <i>‘packs a big punch’.</i></div>
<br />
Help us continue our work with the media, professionals and policy-makers to ensure that young people’s right to reliable information on pregnancy and abortion remains on the agenda:<br />
<br />
• <a href="http://www.efc.org.uk/about_us/donate.html" target="_blank">Become a pro-choice pal</a> and make a small regular donation<br />
• Volunteer, and raise awareness of EFC’s work and resources as a <a href="http://www.efc.org.uk/about_us/be_a_champion_for_choice.html" target="_blank">Champion For Choice</a><br />
• Spread the word and ask your friends and contacts to <a href="http://www.justgiving.com/educationforchoice/Donate" target="_blank">support our work</a><br />
<br />
Our donors say:<br />
<blockquote>
<i>“Without Education for Choice too many young women wouldn't
know where to turn when faced with a crisis pregnancy.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Keep up the excellent work!”</i> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
<i>“A small regular donation because you shout loudly when
often I just don't seem to have the time or energy to add my voice - thank you.”</i> </blockquote>
<blockquote>
<i>"Keep doing what you do. Young people need evidence based education about sex & pregnancy."</i></blockquote>
<br />
<br />Education For Choicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16482936978729743948noreply@blogger.com0